Filippo Baldi vs Ugo Humbert — Ismaning CH Semi-final

Ismaning CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
ITA
Filippo Baldi
30 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLWLWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 15 October 2018
hard
Ugo Humbert
FRA2
Ugo Humbert
#29ATP
1868ELO
1843Hard ELO
$1.1MYTD
$12MCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWLWWW
Baldi F.
6-4 7-5
Humbert U.
Baldi F.
672
Humbert U.
450

Filippo Baldi defeated Ugo Humbert 6-4 7-5 in the Ismaning CH semi-final on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Baldi F.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Humbert U.

Humbert U.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Baldi F.

Serve advantage — Humbert U.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Baldi F.Humbert U.
—
Serve
64
—
Return
15

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Baldi F.Humbert U.
1st serve in·Even
64%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
65%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
53%
Service points won·Slight edge
60%
66%
Return points won·Even
38%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
59%
65%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.0
6.8
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.6
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (167 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Baldi F.Humbert U.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
23
70
Break points saved·Dominant
57
99
Break points won·Clear edge
23
37
Deciding sets·Dominant
37
78
Tiebreaks·Dominant
36
91

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Baldi F.Humbert U.
Freshness·
—
96

Humbert U.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Baldi F.
Sakharov G.
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Sakharov G.
Haerteis J.
6-46-2
Baldi F.
Humbert U.[2]
6-47-5
Quarter-finals
Sakharov G.
Jahn J.
6-33-66-3
Humbert U.[2]
Viola M.
6-16-2
Baldi F.
Krawietz K.
4-66-26-4
Haerteis J.
Masur D.
7-56-3
R16
Baldi F.
Bonzi B.
7-642-67-64
Krawietz K.
Barrere G.[6]
5-77-57-64
Sakharov G.
Travaglia S.[4]
3-66-46-4
Haerteis J.
Klein L.
6-34-67-5
Masur D.
Cachin P.
6-26-2
Humbert U.[2]
Seraphim C.
6-36-4
Jahn J.
Wessels L.
7-656-4
Viola M.
Ward J.
7-51-67-63
R32
Seraphim C.
Mager G.
7-657-65
Humbert U.[2]
Lamasine T.
7-616-3
Ward J.
Halys Q.[7]
6-766-37-63
Wessels L.
Miedler L.[8]
7-6106-3
Haerteis J.
Novak D.[5]
0-67-657-5
Masur D.
Zapata Miralles B.
7-666-3
Cachin P.
Sonego L.[1]
5-76-46-4
Barrere G.[6]
Lemstra K.
7-656-3
Krawietz K.
Grigelis L.
6-47-64
Travaglia S.[4]
Brkic T.
7-56-3
Bonzi B.
Heyman C.
7-54-66-4
Viola M.
Safranek V.
6-46-2
Baldi F.
Trungelliti M.[3]
6-36-4
Klein L.
Erler A.
6-36-4
Sakharov G.
Ojeda Lara R.
6-36-1
Jahn J.
Brown D.
6-11-0