Thomas Fabbiano vs Radu Albot — Ningbo CH Semi-final

Ningbo CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
ITA3
Thomas Fabbiano
37 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 15 October 2018
hard
Radu Albot
MDA2
Radu Albot
#490ATP
1453ELO
1429Hard ELO
36 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLWWWL
Fabbiano T.
6-1 6-3
Albot R.
Fabbiano T.
662
Albot R.
130

Thomas Fabbiano defeated Radu Albot 6-1 6-3 in the Ningbo CH semi-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Radu Albot came in defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Fabbiano T.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Albot R.

Albot R.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Fabbiano T.

Serve advantage — Albot R.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Fabbiano T.Albot R.
1st serve in·Even
64%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
50%
Service points won·Even
61%
60%
Return points won·Even
38%
41%
Break points saved·Even
59%
59%
Aces / match·Even
2.0
2.0
Double faults / match·Even
2.7
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Fabbiano T.Albot R.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
28
46
Break points saved·Even
81
85
Break points won·Even
16
19
Deciding sets·Dominant
28
76
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
44
29

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Fabbiano T.Albot R.
Freshness·
—
93

Albot R.: 9 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Fabbiano T.[3]
Gunneswaran P.[7]
7-644-66-3
Semi-finals
Gunneswaran P.[7]
Kecmanovic M.[5]
6-26-2
Fabbiano T.[3]
Albot R.[2]
6-16-3
Quarter-finals
Gunneswaran P.[7]
Chung Y.
6-26-1
Fabbiano T.[3]
Gaio F.
1-66-46-4
Albot R.[2]
Ito T.[8]
7-56-4
Kecmanovic M.[5]
Durasovic V.
6-26-4
R16
Ito T.[8]
Te R.
6-46-4
Fabbiano T.[3]
Moriya H.
6-46-4
Gaio F.
Soeda G.
6-47-67
Gunneswaran P.[7]
Li Z.
6-32-67-60
Kecmanovic M.[5]
Davidovich Fokina A.
4-66-36-4
Durasovic V.
Hurkacz H.[1]
7-646-4
Albot R.[2]
Tokuda R.
6-47-63
Chung Y.
Watanuki Y.
2-67-656-3
R32
Fabbiano T.[3]
Nagal S.
4-66-46-2
Li Z.
Oliveira G.
4-67-656-3
Te R.
Zhang Z.
6-16-2
Moriya H.
Wu D.
6-46-4
Gaio F.
Coppejans K.
6-32-66-4
Watanuki Y.
Broady L.
6-27-5
Kecmanovic M.[5]
He Y.
6-16-4
Davidovich Fokina A.
Yang T.
6-37-5
Ito T.[8]
Takahashi Y.
7-636-3
Chung Y.
Ramanathan R.[4]
1-67-677-62
Albot R.[2]
Sun F.
6-46-3
Durasovic V.
Wu Y.
6-47-5
Tokuda R.
Myneni S.
6-36-2
Hurkacz H.[1]
Xia Z.
6-37-63
Gunneswaran P.[7]
Safwat M.
7-676-2
Soeda G.
Lopez Perez E.[6]
7-693-67-67