Matthew Ebden vs Peter Gojowczyk — Shanghai Masters Round of 16

Shanghai Masters · ATP · Round of 16
AUS
Matthew Ebden
38 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 8 October 2018
hard
GER
Peter Gojowczyk
36 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLWWLW
Ebden M.
6-2 6-3
Gojowczyk P.
Ebden M.
662
Gojowczyk P.
230

Matthew Ebden defeated Peter Gojowczyk 6-2 6-3 in the Shanghai Masters round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Matthew Ebden came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Matthew Ebden extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2017-07-17NewportSFgrassMatthew Ebden6-3 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Ebden M.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Gojowczyk P.

Gojowczyk P.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Ebden M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ebden M.Gojowczyk P.
1st serve in·Slight edge
61%
53%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
47%
Service points won·Even
63%
61%
Return points won·Even
36%
37%
Break points saved·Even
60%
60%
Aces / match·Even
6.5
6.2
Double faults / match·Slight edge
4.5
4.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (139 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ebden M.Gojowczyk P.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
45
61
Break points saved·Even
86
89
Break points won·Even
32
35
Deciding sets·Clear edge
58
75
Tiebreaks·Dominant
34
76

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Weather
25°COvercast
Wind 12 km/hHumidity 50%
Final
Djokovic N.[2]
Coric B.[13]
6-36-4
Semi-finals
Djokovic N.[2]
Zverev A.[4]
6-26-1
Coric B.[13]
Federer R.[1]
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Djokovic N.[2]
Anderson K.[7]
7-616-3
Coric B.[13]
Ebden M.
7-56-4
Federer R.[1]
Nishikori K.[8]
6-47-64
Zverev A.[4]
Edmund K.[11]
6-46-4
R16
Coric B.[13]
del Potro J.[3]
7-50-0
Djokovic N.[2]
Cecchinato M.[16]
6-46-0
Anderson K.[7]
Tsitsipas S.[10]
6-47-61
Zverev A.[4]
De Minaur A.
6-16-4
Ebden M.
Gojowczyk P.
6-26-3
Nishikori K.[8]
Querrey S.
7-676-4
Federer R.[1]
Bautista Agut R.
6-32-66-4
Edmund K.[11]
Jarry N.
7-656-3
R32
Cecchinato M.[16]
Chung H.
4-67-657-65
Tsitsipas S.[10]
Khachanov K.
6-47-68
Anderson K.[7]
Kukushkin M.
6-36-2
Zverev A.[4]
Basilashvili N.
7-56-4
Edmund K.[11]
Seppi A.
6-36-4
Jarry N.
Cilic M.[5]
2-67-667-5
Ebden M.
Thiem D.[6]
6-46-787-64
Bautista Agut R.
Mcdonald M.
3-66-46-1
Federer R.[1]
Medvedev D.
6-44-66-4
Gojowczyk P.
Fucsovics M.
6-46-737-65
Coric B.[13]
Klahn B.
6-46-2
del Potro J.[3]
Gasquet R.
7-57-67
Querrey S.
Fritz T.
6-36-747-5
Nishikori K.[8]
Wu Y.
3-66-06-3
De Minaur A.
Paire B.
6-46-3
Djokovic N.[2]
Chardy J.
6-37-5
R64
Ebden M.
Tiafoe F.
3-66-46-3
Chardy J.
Marterer M.
6-37-65
Cecchinato M.[16]
Simon G.
6-746-47-62
Tsitsipas S.[10]
Monfils G.
7-644-66-4
Kukushkin M.
Ramos A.
6-46-2
Basilashvili N.
Shapovalov D.
6-26-2
Paire B.
Carreno Busta P.[15]
6-36-4
Seppi A.
Mannarino A.
6-46-4
Jarry N.
Zverev M.
6-43-67-65
Coric B.[13]
Wawrinka S.
4-66-46-3
Klahn B.
Kyrgios N.
4-66-46-3
Gasquet R.
Mayer L.
1-66-26-1
Wu Y.
Li Z.
7-656-2
Fritz T.
Haase R.
6-37-63
Querrey S.
Schwartzman D.[9]
6-36-4
Medvedev D.
Zhang Z.
3-67-676-4
De Minaur A.
Pospisil V.
6-47-64
Gojowczyk P.
Sock J.[12]
6-46-766-3
Khachanov K.
Johnson S.
6-766-36-4
Edmund K.[11]
Krajinovic F.
7-56-3
Chung H.
Hurkacz H.
6-42-66-1
Mcdonald M.
Raonic M.[14]
6-35-76-3
Bautista Agut R.
Rublev A.
6-36-4
Fucsovics M.
Dzumhur D.
6-36-4