Borna Coric vs Roger Federer — Shanghai Masters Semi-final
Shanghai Masters · ATP · Semi-final
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 8 October 2018
hard
Coric B.6-4 6-4
Federer R.
Coric B.
662
Federer R.
440
Borna Coric defeated Roger Federer 6-4 6-4 in the Shanghai Masters semi-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Roger Federer came in leading the head-to-head 4–1, defending the title. Borna Coric narrowed the head-to-head to 4–2.
Key context
- Match story: Borna Coric edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.
Head to head
1–4| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-13 | Rome Masters | R16 | clay | Roger Federer | 2-6 6-4 7-6(7) |
| 2019-02-25 | Dubai | SF | hard | Roger Federer | 6-2 6-2 |
| 2018-06-18 | Halle | F | grass | Borna Coric | 7-6(6) 3-6 6-2 |
| 2018-03-05 | Indian Wells Masters | SF | hard | Roger Federer | 5-7 6-4 6-4 |
| 2015-02-23 | Dubai | SF | hard | Roger Federer | 6-2 6-1 |
Serve vs return
This seasonServe-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks
Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Even
61%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
78%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
52%
58%
Service points won·Slight edge
65%
71%
Return points won·Even
36%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
62%
69%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.8
8.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.1
1.7
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 137). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Clear edge
71
92
Break points saved·Even
98
100
Break points won·Dominant
36
83
Deciding sets·Clear edge
84
99
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
90
100
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About
Conditions
Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Weather
25°COvercast
Wind 12 km/hHumidity 50%
Quarter-finals
Djokovic N.[2]
Anderson K.[7]
7-616-3
Coric B.[13]
Ebden M.
7-56-4
Federer R.[1]
Nishikori K.[8]
6-47-64
Zverev A.[4]
Edmund K.[11]
6-46-4
R16
Coric B.[13]
del Potro J.[3]
7-50-0
Djokovic N.[2]
Cecchinato M.[16]
6-46-0
Anderson K.[7]
Tsitsipas S.[10]
6-47-61
Zverev A.[4]
De Minaur A.
6-16-4
Ebden M.
Gojowczyk P.
6-26-3
Nishikori K.[8]
Querrey S.
7-676-4
Federer R.[1]
Bautista Agut R.
6-32-66-4
Edmund K.[11]
Jarry N.
7-656-3
R32
Cecchinato M.[16]
Chung H.
4-67-657-65
Tsitsipas S.[10]
Khachanov K.
6-47-68
Anderson K.[7]
Kukushkin M.
6-36-2
Zverev A.[4]
Basilashvili N.
7-56-4
Edmund K.[11]
Seppi A.
6-36-4
Jarry N.
Cilic M.[5]
2-67-667-5
Ebden M.
Thiem D.[6]
6-46-787-64
Bautista Agut R.
Mcdonald M.
3-66-46-1
Federer R.[1]
Medvedev D.
6-44-66-4
Gojowczyk P.
Fucsovics M.
6-46-737-65
Coric B.[13]
Klahn B.
6-46-2
del Potro J.[3]
Gasquet R.
7-57-67
Querrey S.
Fritz T.
6-36-747-5
Nishikori K.[8]
Wu Y.
3-66-06-3
De Minaur A.
Paire B.
6-46-3
Djokovic N.[2]
Chardy J.
6-37-5
R64
Ebden M.
Tiafoe F.
3-66-46-3
Chardy J.
Marterer M.
6-37-65
Cecchinato M.[16]
Simon G.
6-746-47-62
Tsitsipas S.[10]
Monfils G.
7-644-66-4
Kukushkin M.
Ramos A.
6-46-2
Basilashvili N.
Shapovalov D.
6-26-2
Paire B.
Carreno Busta P.[15]
6-36-4
Seppi A.
Mannarino A.
6-46-4
Jarry N.
Zverev M.
6-43-67-65
Coric B.[13]
Wawrinka S.
4-66-46-3
Klahn B.
Kyrgios N.
4-66-46-3
Gasquet R.
Mayer L.
1-66-26-1
Wu Y.
Li Z.
7-656-2
Fritz T.
Haase R.
6-37-63
Querrey S.
Schwartzman D.[9]
6-36-4
Medvedev D.
Zhang Z.
3-67-676-4
De Minaur A.
Pospisil V.
6-47-64
Gojowczyk P.
Sock J.[12]
6-46-766-3
Khachanov K.
Johnson S.
6-766-36-4
Edmund K.[11]
Krajinovic F.
7-56-3
Chung H.
Hurkacz H.
6-42-66-1
Mcdonald M.
Raonic M.[14]
6-35-76-3
Bautista Agut R.
Rublev A.
6-36-4
Fucsovics M.
Dzumhur D.
6-36-4