Garbine Muguruza vs Kate Makarova — Beijing Round of 64
Beijing · WTA · Round of 64
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 1 October 2018
hard
Muguruza G.6-0 6-4
Makarova K.
Muguruza G.
662
Makarova K.
040
Garbine Muguruza defeated Kate Makarova 6-0 6-4 in the Beijing round of 64 on hard. The result followed the form book — Garbine Muguruza came in leading the head-to-head 3–2, defending last year's round of 64. Garbine Muguruza extended the head-to-head to 4–2.
Key context
- Match story: Garbine Muguruza handed Kate Makarova a first-set bagel in a 6–0 6–4 win.
Head to head
3–2| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-05-09 | Rome | R32 | clay | Garbine Muguruza | 6-1 6-0 |
| 2014-10-27 | Tournament of Champions | RR | hard | Garbine Muguruza | 6-2 6-1 |
| 2014-09-29 | Beijing | R64 | hard | Kate Makarova | 6-7(8) 6-4 6-4 |
| 2013-06-24 | Wimbledon | R64 | grass | Kate Makarova | 6-2 6-7(3) 6-4 |
| 2013-03-04 | Indian Wells | R64 | hard | Garbine Muguruza | 6-3 1-6 6-4 |
Serve vs return
This seasonServe advantage — Muguruza G.
Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Even
64%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
63%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
47%
42%
Service points won·Even
59%
56%
Return points won·Even
45%
41%
Break points saved·Even
59%
55%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.4
2.6
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.6
4.0
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (196 vs 41). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Clear edge
72
59
Break points saved·Clear edge
90
78
Break points won·Slight edge
88
77
Deciding sets·Slight edge
67
60
Tiebreaks·Even
69
69
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About
Conditions
Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Weather
23°CClear
Wind 32 km/hHumidity 30%
Draw
Quarter-finals
Wang Q.
Sabalenka A.
7-57-5
Osaka N.[8]
Zhang S.
3-66-47-5
Sevastova A.
Cibulkova D.
6-37-65
Wozniacki C.[2]
Siniakova K.
6-26-2
R16
Wozniacki C.[2]
Kontaveit A.
7-56-4
Osaka N.[8]
Goerges J.[10]
6-16-2
Sabalenka A.
Garcia C.[4]
5-77-636-0
Cibulkova D.
Stephens S.[9]
4-66-26-3
Zhang S.
Kerber A.[3]
6-12-66-0
Siniakova K.
Bertens K.[11]
6-46-3
Wang Q.
Pliskova K.[7]
6-46-4
Sevastova A.
Vekic D.
6-36-2
R32
Sevastova A.
Keys M.[17]
W/O
Zhang S.
Babos T.
6-16-2
Kerber A.[3]
Suarez Navarro C.
7-646-1
Stephens S.[9]
Zheng S.
6-16-3
Vekic D.
Jabeur O.
7-656-4
Wozniacki C.[2]
Martic P.
7-56-3
Bertens K.[11]
Flipkens K.
6-16-1
Wang Q.
Ostapenko J.[12]
6-06-0
Goerges J.[10]
Tsurenko L.
6-44-62-2
Pliskova K.[7]
Sasnovich A.
6-36-4
Osaka N.[8]
Collins D.
6-16-0
Cibulkova D.
Saville D.
6-36-3
Kontaveit A.
Siegemund L.
2-66-36-2
Siniakova K.
Krunic A.
7-626-2
Garcia C.[4]
Hercog P.
7-626-3
Sabalenka A.
Muguruza G.[14]
7-56-4
R64
Jabeur O.
Halep S.[1]
6-10-0
Siegemund L.
Kasatkina D.[13]
6-34-2
Pliskova K.[7]
Stosur S.
6-46-4
Tsurenko L.
Petkovic A.
6-27-62
Goerges J.[10]
Konta J.
6-24-66-3
Suarez Navarro C.
Putintseva Y.
6-16-0
Kerber A.[3]
Mladenovic K.
6-26-2
Zheng S.
Yastremska D.
6-46-3
Stephens S.[9]
Pavlyuchenkova A.
6-786-46-4
Babos T.
Hsieh S.
6-26-2
Zhang S.
Mertens E.[15]
6-13-66-3
Keys M.[17]
Pera B.
6-36-4
Sevastova A.
Cornet A.
6-46-2
Martic P.
Strycova B.
6-26-3
Cibulkova D.
Duan Y.
6-36-2
Muguruza G.[14]
Makarova K.
6-06-4
Osaka N.[8]
Diyas Z.
6-46-3
Wozniacki C.[2]
Bencic B.
6-26-3
Vekic D.
Sakkari M.
6-16-4
Krunic A.
Svitolina E.[6]
0-66-47-64
Bertens K.[11]
Cirstea S.
6-26-0
Flipkens K.
Boulter K.
4-66-27-5
Garcia C.[4]
Wang Y.
7-6106-746-3
Collins D.
Bacsinszky T.
6-23-66-3
Saville D.
Kvitova P.[5]
6-26-1
Siniakova K.
Van Uytvanck A.
7-56-4
Hercog P.
Vandeweghe C.
6-26-1
Ostapenko J.[12]
Rybarikova M.
6-47-63
Sasnovich A.
Buzarnescu M.
6-36-1