Daria Saville vs Petra Kvitova — Beijing Round of 64
Beijing · WTA · Round of 64
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 1 October 2018
hard
Saville D.6-2 6-1
Kvitova P.
Saville D.
662
Kvitova P.
210
Daria Saville defeated Petra Kvitova 6-2 6-1 in the Beijing round of 64 on hard. The result followed the form book — Daria Saville came in leading the head-to-head 3–2, defending last year's round of 16. Daria Saville extended the head-to-head to 4–2.
Key context
- Match story: Daria Saville dropped just 3 games past Petra Kvitova.
Head to head
3–2| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-05-23 | Roland Garros | R64 | clay | Daria Saville | 6-4 6-2 |
| 2018-06-18 | Birmingham | R16 | grass | Petra Kvitova | 6-2 6-2 |
| 2016-05-02 | Madrid | R16 | clay | Daria Saville | 6-3 6-4 |
| 2016-01-18 | Australian Open | R64 | hard | Daria Saville | 6-4 6-4 |
| 2015-09-28 | Wuhan | R32 | hard | Petra Kvitova | 6-3 4-6 7-5 |
Serve vs return
This seasonServe advantage — Kvitova P.
Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Even
65%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
62%
69%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
42%
49%
Service points won·Slight edge
55%
61%
Return points won·Even
45%
43%
Break points saved·Even
56%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
1.9
4.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
5.6
4.7
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Clear edge
64
88
Break points saved·Clear edge
79
93
Break points won·Even
87
88
Deciding sets·Clear edge
70
90
Tiebreaks·Dominant
51
92
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About
Conditions
Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Weather
23°CClear
Wind 32 km/hHumidity 30%
Draw
Quarter-finals
Wang Q.
Sabalenka A.
7-57-5
Osaka N.[8]
Zhang S.
3-66-47-5
Sevastova A.
Cibulkova D.
6-37-65
Wozniacki C.[2]
Siniakova K.
6-26-2
R16
Wozniacki C.[2]
Kontaveit A.
7-56-4
Osaka N.[8]
Goerges J.[10]
6-16-2
Sabalenka A.
Garcia C.[4]
5-77-636-0
Cibulkova D.
Stephens S.[9]
4-66-26-3
Zhang S.
Kerber A.[3]
6-12-66-0
Siniakova K.
Bertens K.[11]
6-46-3
Wang Q.
Pliskova K.[7]
6-46-4
Sevastova A.
Vekic D.
6-36-2
R32
Sevastova A.
Keys M.[17]
W/O
Zhang S.
Babos T.
6-16-2
Kerber A.[3]
Suarez Navarro C.
7-646-1
Stephens S.[9]
Zheng S.
6-16-3
Vekic D.
Jabeur O.
7-656-4
Wozniacki C.[2]
Martic P.
7-56-3
Bertens K.[11]
Flipkens K.
6-16-1
Wang Q.
Ostapenko J.[12]
6-06-0
Goerges J.[10]
Tsurenko L.
6-44-62-2
Pliskova K.[7]
Sasnovich A.
6-36-4
Osaka N.[8]
Collins D.
6-16-0
Cibulkova D.
Saville D.
6-36-3
Kontaveit A.
Siegemund L.
2-66-36-2
Siniakova K.
Krunic A.
7-626-2
Garcia C.[4]
Hercog P.
7-626-3
Sabalenka A.
Muguruza G.[14]
7-56-4
R64
Jabeur O.
Halep S.[1]
6-10-0
Siegemund L.
Kasatkina D.[13]
6-34-2
Pliskova K.[7]
Stosur S.
6-46-4
Tsurenko L.
Petkovic A.
6-27-62
Goerges J.[10]
Konta J.
6-24-66-3
Suarez Navarro C.
Putintseva Y.
6-16-0
Kerber A.[3]
Mladenovic K.
6-26-2
Zheng S.
Yastremska D.
6-46-3
Stephens S.[9]
Pavlyuchenkova A.
6-786-46-4
Babos T.
Hsieh S.
6-26-2
Zhang S.
Mertens E.[15]
6-13-66-3
Keys M.[17]
Pera B.
6-36-4
Sevastova A.
Cornet A.
6-46-2
Martic P.
Strycova B.
6-26-3
Cibulkova D.
Duan Y.
6-36-2
Muguruza G.[14]
Makarova K.
6-06-4
Osaka N.[8]
Diyas Z.
6-46-3
Wozniacki C.[2]
Bencic B.
6-26-3
Vekic D.
Sakkari M.
6-16-4
Krunic A.
Svitolina E.[6]
0-66-47-64
Bertens K.[11]
Cirstea S.
6-26-0
Flipkens K.
Boulter K.
4-66-27-5
Garcia C.[4]
Wang Y.
7-6106-746-3
Collins D.
Bacsinszky T.
6-23-66-3
Saville D.
Kvitova P.[5]
6-26-1
Siniakova K.
Van Uytvanck A.
7-56-4
Hercog P.
Vandeweghe C.
6-26-1
Ostapenko J.[12]
Rybarikova M.
6-47-63
Sasnovich A.
Buzarnescu M.
6-36-1