Tobias Kamke vs Quentin Halys — Almaty CH Round of 32

Almaty CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
GER
Tobias Kamke
40 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 1 October 2018
clay
Quentin Halys
FRA4
Quentin Halys
#90ATP
1707ELO
1664Clay ELO
$694kYTD
$5.4MCAREER
29 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLWWL
Kamke T.
6-2 6-4
Halys Q.
Kamke T.
662
Halys Q.
240

Tobias Kamke defeated Quentin Halys 6-2 6-4 in the Almaty CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kamke T.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Halys Q.

Halys Q.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Kamke T.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kamke T.Halys Q.
1st serve in·Even
59%
58%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
69%
79%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
61%
67%
Return points won·Slight edge
39%
34%
Break points saved·Slight edge
58%
65%
Aces / match·Dominant
1.8
11.1
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.3
3.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (193 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kamke T.Halys Q.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
14
57
Break points saved·Dominant
69
97
Break points won·Clear edge
22
4
Deciding sets·Dominant
17
75
Tiebreaks·Dominant
7
91

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Kamke T.Halys Q.
Freshness·
—
93

Halys Q.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Rodionov J.
Krstin P.
7-56-2
Istomin D.[1]
Milojevic N.
6-747-656-2
Semi-finals
Rodionov J.
Hanfmann Y.[2]
6-47-5
Krstin P.
Lopez Perez E.
6-16-3
Milojevic N.
Basic M.[3]
3-67-636-3
Istomin D.[1]
Rosol L.[8]
3-66-36-4
Quarter-finals
Krstin P.
Cid R.
6-25-76-3
Lopez Perez E.
Yang T.
7-56-3
Rodionov J.
Nedovyesov A.
3-67-57-64
Hanfmann Y.[2]
Clezar G.
6-36-2
Basic M.[3]
Marchenko I.
7-54-2
Milojevic N.
Griekspoor S.
7-56-2
Istomin D.[1]
Kecmanovic M.[7]
6-36-4
Rosol L.[8]
Kamke T.
6-16-4
R16
Hanfmann Y.[2]
Munoz de la Nava D.
6-16-3
Rodionov J.
Avidzba A.
6-37-5
Krstin P.
Pavic A.
6-46-2
Cid R.
Takahashi Y.
6-16-0
Lopez Perez E.
Ignatik U.[8]
6-36-0
Nedovyesov A.
Serdarusic N.[7]
5-76-46-4
Clezar G.
Milojevic N.[6]
6-23-66-1
Yang T.
Statham J.
6-36-757-64
Istomin D.[1]
Safwat M.
6-26-1
Kamke T.
Yevseyev D.
2-66-26-0
Rosol L.[8]
Yang T.
7-623-66-2
Milojevic N.
Nedovyesov A.
6-33-66-1
Basic M.[3]
Oliveira G.
7-645-76-4
Marchenko I.
Kolar Z.
3-66-46-4
Kecmanovic M.[7]
Majchrzak K.
7-654-67-61
Griekspoor S.
Dubrivnyy A.
6-17-5
R32
Milojevic N.[6]
Casanova H.
6-26-3
Krstin P.
Safwat M.[5]
6-46-2
Nedovyesov A.
Khabibulin T.
6-43-66-2
Cid R.
Lee D.
7-57-5
Hanfmann Y.[2]
Masur D.
7-636-1
Statham J.
Ofner S.[4]
6-36-2
Yang T.
Skatov T.
6-06-1
Avidzba A.
Dellien H.[3]
6-46-4
Rodionov J.
Boluda Purkiss C.
3-66-36-2
Clezar G.
Oliveira G.
3-66-36-1
Lopez Perez E.
Uchiyama Y.
5-76-36-2
Munoz de la Nava D.
Yevseyev D.
6-47-65
Pavic A.
Nedelko I.
6-16-3
Ignatik U.[8]
Nagal S.
6-736-46-1
Serdarusic N.[7]
Granollers G.
6-37-64
Takahashi Y.
Hemery C.[1]
3-2
Kolar Z.
Ayap S.
6-36-3
Yevseyev D.
Nedelko I.
6-44-66-4
Kecmanovic M.[7]
Safiullin R.
6-33-66-2
Rosol L.[8]
Karlovskiy E.
2-66-36-4
Kamke T.
Halys Q.[4]
6-26-4
Majchrzak K.
Bublik A.
6-36-3
Yang T.
Gabashvili T.
7-656-4
Griekspoor S.
Escoffier A.
7-54-66-3
Dubrivnyy A.
Ignatik U.
7-656-4
Safwat M.
Sultanov K.
6-24-67-64
Milojevic N.
Auger Aliassime F.[5]
6-41-67-5
Oliveira G.
Statham J.
6-17-64
Istomin D.[1]
Ferreira Silva F.
6-37-5
Marchenko I.
Lopez Perez E.[6]
3-66-36-4
Basic M.[3]
Petrovic D.
6-36-3
Nedovyesov A.
Tashbulatov D.
6-36-1