Cem Ilkel vs Sebastian Korda — Tiburon CH Qualifying Round 1

Tiburon CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
Cem Ilkel
TUR2
Cem Ilkel
#1462ATP
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 24 September 2018
hard
Sebastian Korda
USA
Sebastian Korda
#63ATP
1809ELO
1765Hard ELO
$471kYTD
$9.0MCAREER
26 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWWWW
Ilkel C.
7-6 6-2
Korda S.
Ilkel C.
7762
Korda S.
6320

Cem Ilkel defeated Sebastian Korda 7-6 6-2 in the Tiburon CH qualifying round 1 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Sebastian Korda came in ranked #63, leading the head-to-head 1–0. Cem Ilkel claimed a first win over Sebastian Korda in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Cem Ilkel closed it out in two sets, 7–6 6–2.

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2022-09-26Tel AvivR32hardSebastian Korda6-4 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Ilkel C.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Korda S.

Korda S.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Ilkel C.

Serve advantage — Korda S.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Ilkel C.Korda S.
—
Serve
61
—
Return
58

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Ilkel C.Korda S.
1st serve in·Even
58%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
52%
Service points won·Even
62%
66%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Even
57%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.7
8.1
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.5
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 198). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ilkel C.Korda S.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
32
87
Break points saved·Dominant
49
98
Break points won·Dominant
3
73
Deciding sets·Dominant
70
96
Tiebreaks·Dominant
66
94

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Q3
Ortega Olmedo R.[7]
Choinski J.[4]
7-616-3
Sarkissian A.
Vivero Gonzalez P.
6-36-736-2
Ilkel C.[2]
Saville L.
6-36-736-3
Diez S.[8]
Broady L.[1]
6-16-3
Q2
Diez S.[8]
Kelly D.
6-47-65
Ortega Olmedo R.[7]
Giron M.
6-31-67-5
Choinski J.[4]
Gomez Gb42 A.
6-41-66-0
Vivero Gonzalez P.
Gonzalez A.
6-36-1
Sarkissian A.
Krueger M.[3]
6-26-4
Saville L.
Olivo R.
6-06-4
Ilkel C.[2]
Brooksby J.
6-44-66-4
Broady L.[1]
Hiltzik J.
6-37-5
Q1
Kelly D.
Ellis B.
6-37-5
Brooksby J.
Souza J.
7-56-1
Saville L.
Perez Sanz D.
6-46-4
Sarkissian A.
Nielsen F.
6-47-5
Ortega Olmedo R.[7]
Fanselow S.
6-16-2
Giron M.
Huesler M.
6-27-61
Vivero Gonzalez P.
Uchida K.[5]
4-66-46-4
Gonzalez A.
Ritschard A.
6-16-4
Krueger M.[3]
Lokoli L.
7-626-1
Olivo R.
Heliovaara H.[6]
6-23-67-62
Ilkel C.[2]
Korda S.
7-636-2
Diez S.[8]
Pasha N.
6-06-3
Hiltzik J.
Nguyen D.
6-46-736-1
Broady L.[1]
Lakat F.
6-46-4