Daniel Brands vs Ugo Humbert — Orleans CH Round of 16

Orleans CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
GER
Daniel Brands
38 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWLLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 24 September 2018
hard
Ugo Humbert
FRA6
Ugo Humbert
#29ATP
1868ELO
1843Hard ELO
$1.1MYTD
$12MCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWLWWW
Brands D.
6-2 3-6 6-3
Humbert U.
Brands D.
6362
Humbert U.
2631

Daniel Brands defeated Ugo Humbert 6-2 3-6 6-3 in the Orleans CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Daniel Brands closed it out in three sets, 6–2 3–6 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Brands D.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Humbert U.

Humbert U.serving91% hold

wins 71% of points on serve vs Brands D.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Brands D.Humbert U.
—
Serve
64
—
Return
15

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Brands D.Humbert U.
1st serve in·Slight edge
67%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
74%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
53%
Service points won·Even
66%
66%
Return points won·Even
34%
37%
Break points saved·Even
66%
65%
Aces / match·Clear edge
8.4
6.8
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.9
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (68 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Brands D.Humbert U.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
46
70
Break points saved·Slight edge
90
99
Break points won·Dominant
7
37
Deciding sets·Slight edge
72
78
Tiebreaks·Dominant
49
91

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Brands D.Humbert U.
Freshness·
—
96

Humbert U.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Bedene A.[2]
Hoang A.
4-66-17-66
Semi-finals
Bedene A.[2]
De Schepper K.
6-17-66
Hoang A.
Vanni L.
6-27-65
Quarter-finals
Hoang A.
Brands D.
6-36-1
Vanni L.
Griekspoor T.
6-36-4
Bedene A.[2]
Stakhovsky S.
7-676-4
De Schepper K.
Ymer E.
7-637-5
R16
Bedene A.[2]
Lestienne C.
6-43-66-3
Stakhovsky S.
Halys Q.
7-53-67-64
Ymer E.
Sonego L.[4]
7-676-3
Griekspoor T.
Moutet C.[5]
6-46-3
Brands D.
Humbert U.[6]
6-23-66-3
De Schepper K.
Ruusuvuori E.
6-47-62
Vanni L.
Vatutin A.
6-36-4
Hoang A.
Barrere G.
6-36-3
R32
Halys Q.
Zopp J.[8]
6-41-66-3
Sonego L.[4]
Simon T.
6-36-756-3
Ruusuvuori E.
Kolar Z.
6-36-3
De Schepper K.
Maden Y.[7]
6-06-4
Moutet C.[5]
Otte O.
7-636-726-4
Vatutin A.
Munar J.[3]
6-46-4
Brands D.
Robert S.
6-46-4
Hoang A.
Cornut Chauvinc A.
6-42-66-2
Barrere G.
Rinderknech A.
2-66-36-2
Griekspoor T.
Mahut N.
6-36-4
Ymer E.
Nys H.
6-27-60
Humbert U.[6]
Janvier M.
6-46-746-4
Stakhovsky S.
Wang T.
7-57-65
Lestienne C.
Van Rijthoven T.
7-686-1
Bedene A.[2]
Lopez Perez E.
6-36-4
Vanni L.
Gombos N.
3-66-37-67