Albert Ramos vs Richard GasquetDavis Cup WG SF: FRA vs ESP Round Robin

Davis Cup WG SF: FRA vs ESP · ATP · Round Robin
1558ELO
1520Hard ELO
38 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLLLL
1 — 1
Sets
Friday, 14 September 2018
hard
40 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWLWLL
Ramos A.
1-6 6-4 [12-14]
Gasquet R.
Ramos A.
16[121
Gasquet R.
6414]1

Albert Ramos defeated Richard Gasquet 1-6 6-4 NaN-NaN in the Davis Cup WG SF: FRA vs ESP round robin on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Richard Gasquet came in leading the head-to-head 4–1. Albert Ramos narrowed the head-to-head to 4–2.

Key context

  • Match story: Albert Ramos closed it out in three sets, 1–6 6–4 NaN–NaN.

Head to head

14
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2016-06-27WimbledonR32grassRichard Gasquet2-6 7-6(5) 6-2 6-3
2016-03-21Miami MastersR64hardRichard Gasquet6-4 6-4
2012-04-30EstorilSFclayRichard Gasquet2-6 7-6(1) 7-5
2012-03-21Miami MastersR32hardRichard Gasquet6-2 5-7 6-3
2012-03-08Indian Wells MastersR64hardAlbert Ramos3-6 7-5 6-1

Serve vs return

This season
Ramos A.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Gasquet R.

Gasquet R.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Ramos A.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Slight edge
65%
58%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
66%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
51%
Service points won·Even
60%
63%
Return points won·Even
38%
37%
Break points saved·Even
61%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.1
4.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.9
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
59
75
Break points saved·Even
95
97
Break points won·Even
49
49
Deciding sets·Even
80
84
Tiebreaks·Dominant
22
94

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About