Reilly Opelka vs Dominik KoepferCary CH Quarter-final

Cary CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
#131ATP
1749ELO
1734Hard ELO
$325kYTD
$6.0MCAREER
28 yrs · 211 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 10 September 2018
hard
#1085ATP
32 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLWLWW
Opelka R.
7-6 6-4
Koepfer D.
Opelka R.
7762
Koepfer D.
6440

Reilly Opelka defeated Dominik Koepfer 7-6 6-4 in the Cary CH quarter-final on hard. Reilly Opelka narrowed the head-to-head to 3–2.

Key context

Head to head

13
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2022-01-17Australian OpenR64hardReilly Opelka6-4 6-3 7-6(4)
2021-06-28WimbledonR128grassDominik Koepfer6-4 7-6(3) 6-2
2021-05-03Madrid MastersR64clayDominik Koepfer6-4 6-4
2019-08-26US OpenR64hardDominik Koepfer6-4 6-4 7-6(2)

Serve vs return

This season
Opelka R.serving91% hold

wins 71% of points on serve vs Koepfer D.

Koepfer D.serving94% hold

wins 74% of points on serve vs Opelka R.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Opelka R.Koepfer D.
86
Serve
0
Return

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Even
65%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
79%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
54%
52%
Service points won·Slight edge
70%
63%
Return points won·Slight edge
28%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
70%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
17.5
4.2
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.1
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
63
71
Break points saved·Slight edge
100
94
Break points won·Dominant
1
28
Deciding sets·Slight edge
88
95
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
93
87

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast