Miomir Kecmanovic vs Di Wu — Shanghai CH Quarter-final

Shanghai CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Miomir Kecmanovic
SRB7
Miomir Kecmanovic
#59ATP
1768ELO
1709Hard ELO
$756kYTD
$9.0MCAREER
26 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLWWLLWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 10 September 2018
hard
CHN
Di Wu
34 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLWLLL
Kecmanovic M.
3-6 6-3 6-1
Wu D.
Kecmanovic M.
3662
Wu D.
6311

Miomir Kecmanovic defeated Di Wu 3-6 6-3 6-1 in the Shanghai CH quarter-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Di Wu came in defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kecmanovic M.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Wu D.

Wu D.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Kecmanovic M.

Serve advantage — Kecmanovic M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Kecmanovic M.Wu D.
34
Serve
—
45
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Kecmanovic M.Wu D.
1st serve in·Even
61%
58%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
71%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
50%
Service points won·Slight edge
64%
59%
Return points won·Even
37%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
61%
56%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.6
2.8
Double faults / match·Even
2.1
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 87). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kecmanovic M.Wu D.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
68
4
Break points saved·Dominant
98
37
Break points won·Dominant
67
21
Deciding sets·Dominant
60
18
Tiebreaks·Dominant
69
19

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Kecmanovic M.Wu D.
Freshness·
82
—

Kecmanovic M.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 23 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Kavcic B.
Moriya H.[8]
6-17-61
Semi-finals
Kavcic B.
Kecmanovic M.[7]
4-67-641-0
Moriya H.[8]
Li Z.
6-737-657-64
Quarter-finals
Moriya H.[8]
Bublik A.
6-46-4
Kecmanovic M.[7]
Wu D.
3-66-36-1
Li Z.
Setkic A.
6-46-0
Kavcic B.
Bega A.
6-14-66-2
R16
Kavcic B.
Rodionov J.
6-746-36-4
Bega A.
Kwon S.
7-56-3
Li Z.
Wu Y.
3-66-06-3
Wu D.
Jung J.[1]
6-36-0
Bublik A.
Purcell M.
7-656-3
Setkic A.
Te R.
6-37-65
Kecmanovic M.[7]
Lamasine T.
6-46-3
Moriya H.[8]
Ignatik U.
4-66-36-1
R32
Te R.
Durasovic V.
6-36-3
Setkic A.
Chung Y.
6-36-4
Li Z.
Zhang Z.
6-33-67-5
Purcell M.
Neuchrist M.
6-46-4
Kavcic B.
Peliwo F.[6]
6-15-76-0
Bega A.
Gaio F.
4-66-46-3
Kecmanovic M.[7]
Kelly D.
4-67-686-2
Wu D.
Bai Y.
2-66-26-3
Jung J.[1]
Hua R.
4-67-56-3
Wu Y.
Soeda G.[5]
6-46-2
Rodionov J.
Schnur B.
6-45-77-5
Kwon S.
Ito T.[3]
6-20-0
Bublik A.
Zhang Z.[4]
6-35-76-4
Ignatik U.
Santillan A.
7-666-3
Lamasine T.
Safiullin R.
6-737-646-3
Moriya H.[8]
Yang T.
4-66-36-2