Corentin Moutet vs Cem Ilkel — Istanbul CH Quarter-final

Istanbul CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Corentin Moutet
FRA2
Corentin Moutet
#40ATP
1745ELO
1727Hard ELO
$731kYTD
$6.4MCAREER
27 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 10 September 2018
hard
Cem Ilkel
TUR
Cem Ilkel
#1462ATP
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLWL
Moutet C.
7-6 6-3
Ilkel C.
Moutet C.
7762
Ilkel C.
6430

Corentin Moutet defeated Cem Ilkel 7-6 6-3 in the Istanbul CH quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Corentin Moutet came in ranked #40.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Moutet C.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Ilkel C.

Ilkel C.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Moutet C.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Moutet C.Ilkel C.
7
Serve
—
68
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Moutet C.Ilkel C.
1st serve in·Slight edge
65%
58%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
66%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Even
61%
62%
Return points won·Even
39%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
63%
57%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.7
4.7
Double faults / match·Even
2.3
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Moutet C.Ilkel C.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
82
32
Break points saved·Dominant
97
49
Break points won·Dominant
75
3
Deciding sets·Clear edge
88
70
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
78
66

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Moutet C.Ilkel C.
Freshness·
96
—

Moutet C.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Moutet C.[2]
Halys Q.[4]
6-36-4
Semi-finals
Moutet C.[2]
Hoang A.
2-67-56-0
Halys Q.[4]
Fabbiano T.[1]
6-34-66-4
Quarter-finals
Hoang A.
Miedler L.[8]
6-47-5
Halys Q.[4]
Griekspoor T.[7]
6-43-67-63
Fabbiano T.[1]
Viola M.
3-66-26-4
Moutet C.[2]
Ilkel C.
7-646-3
R16
Moutet C.[2]
Menezes J.
6-46-0
Ilkel C.
Otte O.[6]
6-36-4
Griekspoor T.[7]
Hossam Y.
6-36-2
Halys Q.[4]
Nedovyesov A.
7-646-756-4
Viola M.
Lestienne C.[5]
6-36-1
Fabbiano T.[1]
Bonzi B.
3-66-16-4
Miedler L.[8]
Benchetrit E.
6-37-62
Hoang A.
Oliveira G.
6-706-36-2
R32
Halys Q.[4]
Kuhn N.
6-36-4
Moutet C.[2]
Kamke T.
6-46-2
Menezes J.
Celikbilek A.
7-56-1
Otte O.[6]
Ward J.
6-36-3
Hoang A.
Janvier M.
4-66-36-4
Benchetrit E.
Van Rijthoven T.
7-676-2
Griekspoor T.[7]
Wang T.
6-46-1
Nedovyesov A.
Metreveli A.
6-36-4
Lestienne C.[5]
Masur D.
0-66-37-65
Viola M.
Yevseyev D.
7-636-4
Bonzi B.
Safranek V.
6-16-4
Fabbiano T.[1]
Grenier H.
6-36-2
Oliveira G.
Menendez Maceiras A.[3]
6-32-66-2
Ilkel C.
Kirkin E.
6-24-66-4
Hossam Y.
Yuksel A.
6-36-2
Miedler L.[8]
Couacaud E.
7-53-0