Tommy Paul vs Ruan Roelofse — Chicago CH Round of 32

Chicago CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Tommy Paul
USA
Tommy Paul
#24ATP
1949ELO
1881Hard ELO
$1.7MYTD
$15MCAREER
29 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 3 September 2018
hard
RSA
Ruan Roelofse
36 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLWLWW
Paul T.
6-3 6-2
Roelofse R.
Paul T.
662
Roelofse R.
320

Tommy Paul defeated Ruan Roelofse 6-3 6-2 in the Chicago CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Paul T.serving91% hold

wins 71% of points on serve vs Roelofse R.

Roelofse R.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Paul T.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Paul T.Roelofse R.
71
Serve
—
54
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Paul T.Roelofse R.
1st serve in·Even
62%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
75%
2nd serve points won·Even
54%
54%
Service points won·Even
65%
67%
Return points won·Slight edge
39%
33%
Break points saved·Slight edge
64%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.1
7.7
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.1
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 40). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Paul T.Roelofse R.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
93
22
Break points saved·Dominant
99
58
Break points won·Dominant
87
23
Deciding sets·Dominant
98
40
Tiebreaks·Dominant
96
20

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Paul T.Roelofse R.
Freshness·
91
—

Paul T.: 11 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Istomin D.[2]
Opelka R.
6-46-2
Semi-finals
Istomin D.[2]
Fratangelo B.
6-16-2
Opelka R.
Koepfer D.
6-37-63
Quarter-finals
Fratangelo B.
Rubin N.[8]
6-16-4
Istomin D.[2]
Bemelmans R.[6]
6-36-4
Koepfer D.
Aragone J.
6-46-2
Opelka R.
Young D.
3-66-27-65
R16
Rubin N.[8]
Popyrin A.
5-76-27-5
Fratangelo B.
Bangoura S.
6-41-67-5
Bemelmans R.[6]
Uchida K.
6-36-4
Opelka R.
Mmoh M.[5]
6-46-4
Istomin D.[2]
Paul T.
7-56-3
Koepfer D.
Krueger M.
4-67-646-2
Aragone J.
Sarkissian A.
2-67-647-63
Young D.
Smith J.
6-36-4
R32
Bemelmans R.[6]
Nys H.
7-57-66
Bangoura S.
Escobedo E.
7-634-66-1
Mmoh M.[5]
Eubanks C.
5-76-46-4
Popyrin A.
Estrella V.
6-37-5
Uchida K.
Kwiatkowski T.
6-16-3
Aragone J.
Galan D.
7-656-3
Istomin D.[2]
Arevalo M.
6-46-1
Rubin N.[8]
King E.
6-43-66-3
Young D.
Pospisil V.[3]
6-26-2
Opelka R.
Quiroz R.
6-36-2
Sarkissian A.
Seppi A.[1]
6-37-65
Krueger M.
Ymer E.[7]
3-66-36-2
Paul T.
Roelofse R.
6-36-2
Smith J.
Cid R.
2-66-16-4
Fratangelo B.
Troicki V.[4]
2-66-26-0
Koepfer D.
Millot V.
6-36-4