Reilly Opelka vs Roberto Quiroz — Chicago CH Round of 32

Chicago CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Reilly Opelka
USA
Reilly Opelka
#131ATP
1749ELO
1734Hard ELO
$325kYTD
$6.0MCAREER
28 yrs · 211 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 3 September 2018
hard
ECU
Roberto Quiroz
34 yrs · 193 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLLLLL
Opelka R.
6-3 6-2
Quiroz R.
Opelka R.
662
Quiroz R.
320

Reilly Opelka defeated Roberto Quiroz 6-3 6-2 in the Chicago CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Opelka R.serving93% hold

wins 73% of points on serve vs Quiroz R.

Quiroz R.serving94% hold

wins 74% of points on serve vs Opelka R.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Opelka R.Quiroz R.
86
Serve
—
0
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Opelka R.Quiroz R.
1st serve in·Even
65%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
79%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
54%
52%
Service points won·Slight edge
70%
63%
Return points won·Slight edge
28%
36%
Break points saved·Slight edge
70%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
17.5
4.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.1
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Opelka R.Quiroz R.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
63
14
Break points saved·Clear edge
100
80
Break points won·Slight edge
1
7
Deciding sets·Dominant
88
15
Tiebreaks·Dominant
93
14

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Istomin D.[2]
Opelka R.
6-46-2
Semi-finals
Istomin D.[2]
Fratangelo B.
6-16-2
Opelka R.
Koepfer D.
6-37-63
Quarter-finals
Fratangelo B.
Rubin N.[8]
6-16-4
Istomin D.[2]
Bemelmans R.[6]
6-36-4
Koepfer D.
Aragone J.
6-46-2
Opelka R.
Young D.
3-66-27-65
R16
Rubin N.[8]
Popyrin A.
5-76-27-5
Fratangelo B.
Bangoura S.
6-41-67-5
Bemelmans R.[6]
Uchida K.
6-36-4
Opelka R.
Mmoh M.[5]
6-46-4
Istomin D.[2]
Paul T.
7-56-3
Koepfer D.
Krueger M.
4-67-646-2
Aragone J.
Sarkissian A.
2-67-647-63
Young D.
Smith J.
6-36-4
R32
Bemelmans R.[6]
Nys H.
7-57-66
Bangoura S.
Escobedo E.
7-634-66-1
Mmoh M.[5]
Eubanks C.
5-76-46-4
Popyrin A.
Estrella V.
6-37-5
Uchida K.
Kwiatkowski T.
6-16-3
Aragone J.
Galan D.
7-656-3
Istomin D.[2]
Arevalo M.
6-46-1
Rubin N.[8]
King E.
6-43-66-3
Young D.
Pospisil V.[3]
6-26-2
Opelka R.
Quiroz R.
6-36-2
Sarkissian A.
Seppi A.[1]
6-37-65
Krueger M.
Ymer E.[7]
3-66-36-2
Paul T.
Roelofse R.
6-36-2
Smith J.
Cid R.
2-66-16-4
Fratangelo B.
Troicki V.[4]
2-66-26-0
Koepfer D.
Millot V.
6-36-4