Dominik Koepfer vs Mitchell Krueger — Chicago CH Round of 16

Chicago CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
GER
Dominik Koepfer
#1085ATP
32 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLWLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 3 September 2018
hard
Mitchell Krueger
USA
Mitchell Krueger
#364ATP
1461ELO
1436Hard ELO
32 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLLLLLLLL
Koepfer D.
4-6 7-6 6-2
Krueger M.
Koepfer D.
47762
Krueger M.
66421

Dominik Koepfer defeated Mitchell Krueger 4-6 7-6 6-2 in the Chicago CH round of 16 on hard. Dominik Koepfer extended the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

Head to head

1–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2019-05-27Roland GarrosQ1clayDominik Koepfer7-5 6-1
2019-04-08HoustonQ1clayMitchell Krueger3-6 6-3 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Koepfer D.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Krueger M.

Krueger M.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Koepfer D.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Koepfer D.Krueger M.
1st serve in·Even
62%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
51%
Service points won·Even
63%
63%
Return points won·Even
38%
38%
Break points saved·Even
61%
60%
Aces / match·Even
4.2
4.5
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.5
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Koepfer D.Krueger M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
71
16
Break points saved·Slight edge
94
87
Break points won·Clear edge
28
14
Deciding sets·Dominant
95
13
Tiebreaks·Dominant
87
0

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Koepfer D.Krueger M.
Freshness·
—
87

Krueger M.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 20 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Istomin D.[2]
Opelka R.
6-46-2
Semi-finals
Istomin D.[2]
Fratangelo B.
6-16-2
Opelka R.
Koepfer D.
6-37-63
Quarter-finals
Fratangelo B.
Rubin N.[8]
6-16-4
Istomin D.[2]
Bemelmans R.[6]
6-36-4
Koepfer D.
Aragone J.
6-46-2
Opelka R.
Young D.
3-66-27-65
R16
Rubin N.[8]
Popyrin A.
5-76-27-5
Fratangelo B.
Bangoura S.
6-41-67-5
Bemelmans R.[6]
Uchida K.
6-36-4
Opelka R.
Mmoh M.[5]
6-46-4
Istomin D.[2]
Paul T.
7-56-3
Koepfer D.
Krueger M.
4-67-646-2
Aragone J.
Sarkissian A.
2-67-647-63
Young D.
Smith J.
6-36-4
R32
Bemelmans R.[6]
Nys H.
7-57-66
Bangoura S.
Escobedo E.
7-634-66-1
Mmoh M.[5]
Eubanks C.
5-76-46-4
Popyrin A.
Estrella V.
6-37-5
Uchida K.
Kwiatkowski T.
6-16-3
Aragone J.
Galan D.
7-656-3
Istomin D.[2]
Arevalo M.
6-46-1
Rubin N.[8]
King E.
6-43-66-3
Young D.
Pospisil V.[3]
6-26-2
Opelka R.
Quiroz R.
6-36-2
Sarkissian A.
Seppi A.[1]
6-37-65
Krueger M.
Ymer E.[7]
3-66-36-2
Paul T.
Roelofse R.
6-36-2
Smith J.
Cid R.
2-66-16-4
Fratangelo B.
Troicki V.[4]
2-66-26-0
Koepfer D.
Millot V.
6-36-4