Ugo Humbert vs Tobias Kamke — Cassis CH Round of 16

Cassis CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Ugo Humbert
FRA5
Ugo Humbert
#29ATP
1868ELO
1843Hard ELO
$1.1MYTD
$12MCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 3 September 2018
hard
GER
Tobias Kamke
40 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLWLWL
Humbert U.
6-4 7-6
Kamke T.
Humbert U.
6772
Kamke T.
4640

Ugo Humbert defeated Tobias Kamke 6-4 7-6 in the Cassis CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Humbert U.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Kamke T.

Kamke T.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Humbert U.

Serve advantage — Humbert U.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Humbert U.Kamke T.
64
Serve
—
15
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Humbert U.Kamke T.
1st serve in·Even
62%
59%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
74%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
50%
Service points won·Slight edge
66%
61%
Return points won·Even
37%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
65%
58%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.8
1.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.3
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 193). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Humbert U.Kamke T.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
70
14
Break points saved·Dominant
99
69
Break points won·Clear edge
37
22
Deciding sets·Dominant
78
17
Tiebreaks·Dominant
91
7

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Humbert U.Kamke T.
Freshness·
96
—

Humbert U.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Couacaud E.
Humbert U.[5]
6-26-3
Semi-finals
Humbert U.[5]
Ward J.
7-636-4
Couacaud E.
Menendez Maceiras A.[3]
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Ward J.
Otte O.
7-673-66-3
Menendez Maceiras A.[3]
Hoang A.
6-26-756-3
Humbert U.[5]
Bourgue M.
6-36-3
Couacaud E.
Griekspoor S.
3-66-46-1
R16
Humbert U.[5]
Kamke T.
6-47-64
Menendez Maceiras A.[3]
Muller A.
6-27-5
Griekspoor S.
Moraing M.[8]
6-5
Bourgue M.
Halys Q.
6-06-4
Otte O.
Roca Batalla O.
6-36-4
Hoang A.
Benchetrit E.
6-46-756-1
Ward J.
Griekspoor T.
7-613-66-3
Couacaud E.
Bachinger M.
6-46-3
R32
Bourgue M.
Safranek V.
7-651-0
Griekspoor T.
Tomic B.[6]
6-757-57-5
Menendez Maceiras A.[3]
Rinderknech A.
7-676-3
Halys Q.
Moutet C.[2]
7-646-4
Moraing M.[8]
Gombos N.
7-667-5
Humbert U.[5]
Ilkel C.
7-656-4
Muller A.
Evans D.
6-36-4
Otte O.
Stakhovsky S.[4]
7-623-67-5
Bachinger M.
Oliveira G.
6-36-1
Couacaud E.
Berankis R.[1]
6-756-36-4
Griekspoor S.
Karlovskiy E.
6-46-4
Benchetrit E.
Wang T.
6-16-4
Ward J.
Milojevic N.
6-45-76-4
Hoang A.
Barrere G.[7]
3-67-627-5
Kamke T.
Nedovyesov A.
7-56-4
Roca Batalla O.
Kanar J.
6-36-4