Bjorn Fratangelo vs Noah Rubin — Chicago CH Quarter-final

Chicago CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
USA
Bjorn Fratangelo
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLLWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 3 September 2018
hard
USA8
Noah Rubin
30 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLLLL
Fratangelo B.
6-1 6-4
Rubin N.
Fratangelo B.
662
Rubin N.
140

Bjorn Fratangelo defeated Noah Rubin 6-1 6-4 in the Chicago CH quarter-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Noah Rubin came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Bjorn Fratangelo claimed a first win over Noah Rubin in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2017-01-16Australian OpenR128hardNoah Rubin6-7(4) 7-5 3-6 6-2 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Fratangelo B.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Rubin N.

Rubin N.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Fratangelo B.

Serve advantage — Fratangelo B.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Fratangelo B.Rubin N.
1st serve in·Even
60%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Even
64%
61%
Return points won·Even
38%
38%
Break points saved·Even
63%
60%
Aces / match·Slight edge
5.1
3.8
Double faults / match·Even
2.4
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 151). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Fratangelo B.Rubin N.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
59
49
Break points saved·Slight edge
88
80
Break points won·Clear edge
13
31
Deciding sets·Dominant
87
54
Tiebreaks·Even
81
80

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Istomin D.[2]
Opelka R.
6-46-2
Semi-finals
Istomin D.[2]
Fratangelo B.
6-16-2
Opelka R.
Koepfer D.
6-37-63
Quarter-finals
Fratangelo B.
Rubin N.[8]
6-16-4
Istomin D.[2]
Bemelmans R.[6]
6-36-4
Koepfer D.
Aragone J.
6-46-2
Opelka R.
Young D.
3-66-27-65
R16
Rubin N.[8]
Popyrin A.
5-76-27-5
Fratangelo B.
Bangoura S.
6-41-67-5
Bemelmans R.[6]
Uchida K.
6-36-4
Opelka R.
Mmoh M.[5]
6-46-4
Istomin D.[2]
Paul T.
7-56-3
Koepfer D.
Krueger M.
4-67-646-2
Aragone J.
Sarkissian A.
2-67-647-63
Young D.
Smith J.
6-36-4
R32
Bemelmans R.[6]
Nys H.
7-57-66
Bangoura S.
Escobedo E.
7-634-66-1
Mmoh M.[5]
Eubanks C.
5-76-46-4
Popyrin A.
Estrella V.
6-37-5
Uchida K.
Kwiatkowski T.
6-16-3
Aragone J.
Galan D.
7-656-3
Istomin D.[2]
Arevalo M.
6-46-1
Rubin N.[8]
King E.
6-43-66-3
Young D.
Pospisil V.[3]
6-26-2
Opelka R.
Quiroz R.
6-36-2
Sarkissian A.
Seppi A.[1]
6-37-65
Krueger M.
Ymer E.[7]
3-66-36-2
Paul T.
Roelofse R.
6-36-2
Smith J.
Cid R.
2-66-16-4
Fratangelo B.
Troicki V.[4]
2-66-26-0
Koepfer D.
Millot V.
6-36-4