Michael Mmoh vs Christopher Eubanks — Chicago CH Round of 32

Chicago CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Michael Mmoh
USA5
Michael Mmoh
#188ATP
1613ELO
1599Hard ELO
$85kYTD
$2.4MCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLWWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 3 September 2018
hard
USA
Christopher Eubanks
#788ATP
1523ELO
1493Hard ELO
30 yrs · 201 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLWLLL
Mmoh M.
5-7 6-4 6-4
Eubanks C.
Mmoh M.
5662
Eubanks C.
7441

Michael Mmoh defeated Christopher Eubanks 5-7 6-4 6-4 in the Chicago CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Michael Mmoh came in ranked #188, leading the head-to-head 1–0. Michael Mmoh extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2018-03-19Miami MastersR128hardMichael Mmoh4-6 6-4 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Mmoh M.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Eubanks C.

Eubanks C.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Mmoh M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Mmoh M.Eubanks C.
1st serve in·Even
65%
68%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
74%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
47%
52%
Service points won·Even
63%
67%
Return points won·Slight edge
39%
33%
Break points saved·Even
62%
64%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.0
10.4
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.8
3.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Mmoh M.Eubanks C.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
66
50
Break points saved·Slight edge
91
96
Break points won·Dominant
31
3
Deciding sets·Clear edge
90
67
Tiebreaks·Even
77
74

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Mmoh M.Eubanks C.
Freshness·
95
—

Mmoh M.: 13 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Istomin D.[2]
Opelka R.
6-46-2
Semi-finals
Istomin D.[2]
Fratangelo B.
6-16-2
Opelka R.
Koepfer D.
6-37-63
Quarter-finals
Fratangelo B.
Rubin N.[8]
6-16-4
Istomin D.[2]
Bemelmans R.[6]
6-36-4
Koepfer D.
Aragone J.
6-46-2
Opelka R.
Young D.
3-66-27-65
R16
Rubin N.[8]
Popyrin A.
5-76-27-5
Fratangelo B.
Bangoura S.
6-41-67-5
Bemelmans R.[6]
Uchida K.
6-36-4
Opelka R.
Mmoh M.[5]
6-46-4
Istomin D.[2]
Paul T.
7-56-3
Koepfer D.
Krueger M.
4-67-646-2
Aragone J.
Sarkissian A.
2-67-647-63
Young D.
Smith J.
6-36-4
R32
Bemelmans R.[6]
Nys H.
7-57-66
Bangoura S.
Escobedo E.
7-634-66-1
Mmoh M.[5]
Eubanks C.
5-76-46-4
Popyrin A.
Estrella V.
6-37-5
Uchida K.
Kwiatkowski T.
6-16-3
Aragone J.
Galan D.
7-656-3
Istomin D.[2]
Arevalo M.
6-46-1
Rubin N.[8]
King E.
6-43-66-3
Young D.
Pospisil V.[3]
6-26-2
Opelka R.
Quiroz R.
6-36-2
Sarkissian A.
Seppi A.[1]
6-37-65
Krueger M.
Ymer E.[7]
3-66-36-2
Paul T.
Roelofse R.
6-36-2
Smith J.
Cid R.
2-66-16-4
Fratangelo B.
Troicki V.[4]
2-66-26-0
Koepfer D.
Millot V.
6-36-4