Thomas Fabbiano vs Tim Van Rijthoven — Mallorca CH Round of 32

Mallorca CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ITA1
Thomas Fabbiano
37 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 27 August 2018
hard
NED
Tim Van Rijthoven
29 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
Fabbiano T.
7-5 6-3
Van Rijthoven T.
Fabbiano T.
762
Van Rijthoven T.
530

Thomas Fabbiano defeated Tim Van Rijthoven 7-5 6-3 in the Mallorca CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Tim Van Rijthoven came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Thomas Fabbiano claimed a first win over Tim Van Rijthoven in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2018-02-12RotterdamQ1hardTim Van Rijthoven6-4 7-6(3)

Serve vs return

This season
Fabbiano T.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Van Rijthoven T.

Van Rijthoven T.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Fabbiano T.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Fabbiano T.Van Rijthoven T.
1st serve in·Even
64%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
66%
76%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
53%
Service points won·Slight edge
61%
68%
Return points won·Even
38%
34%
Break points saved·Slight edge
59%
65%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.0
9.8
Double faults / match·Even
2.7
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 167). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Fabbiano T.Van Rijthoven T.
Clutch Rating·Even
28
26
Break points saved·Slight edge
81
90
Break points won·Clear edge
16
1
Deciding sets·Slight edge
28
19
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
44
61

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Tomic B.[6]
Bachinger M.
4-66-37-63
Semi-finals
Tomic B.[6]
De Schepper K.
6-36-4
Bachinger M.
Lopez Perez E.[7]
6-46-3
Quarter-finals
Tomic B.[6]
Gombos N.
6-36-4
Lopez Perez E.[7]
Kuhn N.
6-17-68
Bachinger M.
Fabbiano T.[1]
3-66-26-2
De Schepper K.
Brands D.
6-16-2
R16
Bachinger M.
Simon T.
6-10-0
Fabbiano T.[1]
Otte O.
6-06-2
Tomic B.[6]
Cachin P.
6-26-4
Kuhn N.
Ramanathan R.[3]
6-747-626-4
Brands D.
Evans D.
6-47-66
Lopez Perez E.[7]
Gabashvili T.
6-26-4
De Schepper K.
Stakhovsky S.[4]
6-26-4
Gombos N.
Andujar P.[2]
6-46-2
R32
Stakhovsky S.[4]
Gomez E.
6-47-66
Evans D.
Domingues J.
6-36-3
Brands D.
Moraing M.[5]
7-56-2
Kuhn N.
Ward J.
6-767-627-64
Andujar P.[2]
Oliveira G.
6-26-1
Ramanathan R.[3]
Couacaud E.
6-37-63
Bachinger M.
Ojeda Lara R.
6-26-2
Cachin P.
Menezes J.
2-67-56-2
Gabashvili T.
Vanni L.
6-26-3
Lopez Perez E.[7]
Miedler L.
3-67-666-4
Simon T.
Gutierrez Ferrol S.[8]
6-36-2
De Schepper K.
Ortega Olmedo R.
7-656-4
Tomic B.[6]
Vilella Martinez M.
6-16-2
Fabbiano T.[1]
Van Rijthoven T.
7-56-3
Otte O.
Griekspoor T.
6-47-62
Gombos N.
Davidovich Fokina A.
6-36-4