Andreas Seppi vs Joao Sousa — Winston-Salem Round of 64

Winston-Salem · ATP · Round of 64
ITA
Andreas Seppi
42 yrs · 190 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 20 August 2018
hard
POR
Joao Sousa
37 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLLWWL
Seppi A.
7-5 6-4
Sousa J.
Seppi A.
762
Sousa J.
540

Andreas Seppi defeated Joao Sousa 7-5 6-4 in the Winston-Salem round of 64 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Joao Sousa came in leading the head-to-head 3–2, defending last year's round of 32. Andreas Seppi narrowed the head-to-head to 3–3.

Key context

Head to head

2–3
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2021-06-28WimbledonR128grassAndreas Seppi4-6 6-4 7-5 6-2
2020-10-19AntwerpQ1hardJoao Sousa6-4 2-6 6-4
2018-02-12RotterdamR32hardAndreas Seppi6-4 1-6 6-2
2016-10-31Paris MastersR64hardJoao Sousa6-4 6-4
2015-07-20UmagR16clayJoao Sousa6-2 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Seppi A.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Sousa J.

Sousa J.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Seppi A.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Seppi A.Sousa J.
1st serve in·Even
58%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Even
62%
61%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Even
60%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.5
3.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.8
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Seppi A.Sousa J.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
53
35
Break points saved·Even
94
91
Break points won·Dominant
45
14
Deciding sets·Clear edge
63
48
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
32
23

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Medvedev D.
Johnson S.[8]
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Johnson S.[8]
Carreno Busta P.[2]
6-36-4
Medvedev D.
Daniel T.
6-16-1
Quarter-finals
Daniel T.
Jarry N.[14]
4-66-26-1
Medvedev D.
Harrison R.
7-646-4
Carreno Busta P.[2]
Chung H.[6]
6-36-4
Johnson S.[8]
Edmund K.[3]
6-16-2
R16
Daniel T.
Koepfer D.
7-647-63
Carreno Busta P.[2]
Gojowczyk P.[16]
6-27-65
Edmund K.[3]
Carballes Baena R.
7-57-5
Chung H.[6]
Berrettini M.
6-33-66-3
Medvedev D.
Andreozzi G.
7-56-1
Jarry N.[14]
Struff J.
6-26-2
Johnson S.[8]
Munar J.
6-46-4
Harrison R.
Krajinovic F.[7]
6-37-64
R32
Berrettini M.
Basilashvili N.[10]
7-56-3
Harrison R.
Simon G.[12]
W/O
Krajinovic F.[7]
Fritz T.
6-46-1
Carreno Busta P.[2]
Skugor F.
6-36-736-3
Johnson S.[8]
Paul T.
7-676-2
Andreozzi G.
Albot R.
6-46-3
Medvedev D.
De Minaur A.[15]
6-36-3
Struff J.
Cecchinato M.[4]
6-36-4
Carballes Baena R.
Ramos A.[13]
6-16-3
Daniel T.
Querrey S.[9]
3-67-57-63
Gojowczyk P.[16]
Zeballos H.
6-46-746-1
Edmund K.[3]
Mayer L.
6-36-3
Chung H.[6]
Garcia Lopez G.
7-646-2
Jarry N.[14]
Seppi A.
6-46-3
Koepfer D.
Sandgren T.
6-27-65
Munar J.
Rublev A.[11]
6-36-2
R64
Munar J.
Schnur B.
7-657-61
Sandgren T.
Berankis R.
6-46-3
Daniel T.
Millman J.
6-47-67
Garcia Lopez G.
Baghdatis M.
7-626-4
Struff J.
Paire B.
7-656-3
Carballes Baena R.
Pella G.
6-46-2
Berrettini M.
Benneteau J.
6-36-3
Harrison R.
Gojo B.
6-26-4
Skugor F.
Herbert P.
6-26-3
Medvedev D.
Basic M.
6-46-4
Mayer L.
Sugita Y.
6-37-64
Andreozzi G.
Fucsovics M.
6-34-66-0
Paul T.
Djere L.
6-37-64
Zeballos H.
Lacko L.
7-637-5
Seppi A.
Sousa J.
7-56-4
Fritz T.
Jaziri M.
6-16-4