Lucas Pouille vs Andy Murray — Cincinnati Masters Round of 64

Cincinnati Masters · ATP · Round of 64
FRA16
Lucas Pouille
32 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLLLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 13 August 2018
hard
GBR
Andy Murray
39 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLWLWW
Pouille L.
6-1 1-6 6-4
Murray A.
Pouille L.
6162
Murray A.
1641

Lucas Pouille defeated Andy Murray 6-1 1-6 6-4 in the Cincinnati Masters round of 64 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Andy Murray came in leading the head-to-head 4–0. Lucas Pouille claimed a first win over Andy Murray in five meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 4–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Lucas Pouille came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 1–6 6–4.

Head to head

0–4
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2017-02-27DubaiSFhardAndy Murray7-5 6-1
2016-10-31Paris MastersR16hardAndy Murray6-3 6-0
2016-10-10Shanghai MastersR16hardAndy Murray6-1 6-3
2016-05-09Rome MastersSFclayAndy Murray6-2 6-1

Serve vs return

This season
Pouille L.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Murray A.

Murray A.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Pouille L.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Pouille L.Murray A.
1st serve in·Even
56%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
51%
Service points won·Even
63%
64%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
66%
60%
Aces / match·Even
6.2
6.6
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.7
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 191). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Pouille L.Murray A.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
74
92
Break points saved·Even
98
98
Break points won·Dominant
29
79
Deciding sets·Even
96
99
Tiebreaks·Even
94
98

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Weather
26°CMainly clear
Wind 4 km/hHumidity 65%
Final
Djokovic N.[10]
Federer R.[2]
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Djokovic N.[10]
Cilic M.[7]
6-43-66-3
Federer R.[2]
Goffin D.[11]
7-631-1
Quarter-finals
Federer R.[2]
Wawrinka S.
6-727-666-2
Cilic M.[7]
Carreno Busta P.[13]
7-676-4
Djokovic N.[10]
Raonic M.
7-54-66-3
Goffin D.[11]
del Potro J.[4]
7-657-64
R16
Federer R.[2]
Mayer L.
6-17-66
Wawrinka S.
Fucsovics M.
6-46-3
del Potro J.[4]
Kyrgios N.[15]
7-646-766-2
Cilic M.[7]
Khachanov K.
7-653-66-4
Carreno Busta P.[13]
Haase R.
6-46-2
Djokovic N.[10]
Dimitrov G.[5]
2-66-36-4
Raonic M.
Shapovalov D.
7-666-4
Goffin D.[11]
Anderson K.[6]
6-26-4
R32
Federer R.[2]
Gojowczyk P.
6-46-4
Mayer L.
Pouille L.[16]
7-676-4
Wawrinka S.
Nishikori K.
6-46-4
Fucsovics M.
Garcia Lopez G.
6-756-47-5
del Potro J.[4]
Chung H.
6-26-3
Kyrgios N.[15]
Coric B.
7-610-66-3
Goffin D.[11]
Paire B.
5-76-46-2
Cilic M.[7]
Copil M.
6-746-46-4
Khachanov K.
Querrey S.
7-56-4
Haase R.
Zverev A.[3]
5-76-47-5
Dimitrov G.[5]
Zverev M.
7-657-5
Djokovic N.[10]
Mannarino A.
4-66-26-1
Shapovalov D.
Edmund K.[14]
6-47-5
Raonic M.
Jaziri M.
6-37-5
Anderson K.[6]
Chardy J.
7-666-2
Carreno Busta P.[13]
Klahn B.
6-46-4
R64
Raonic M.
Lajovic D.
6-36-3
Copil M.
Kohlschreiber P.
6-46-2
Pouille L.[16]
Murray A.
6-11-66-4
Wawrinka S.
Schwartzman D.[12]
6-24-66-3
Nishikori K.
Rublev A.
7-56-3
Fucsovics M.
Hurkacz H.
4-66-37-66
Chung H.
Sock J.
2-66-16-2
Coric B.
Medvedev D.
6-26-3
Kyrgios N.[15]
Kudla D.
6-727-57-69
Goffin D.[11]
Tsitsipas S.
7-56-3
Paire B.
Ferrer D.
6-26-2
Chardy J.
Verdasco F.
6-16-2
Khachanov K.
Ramos A.
2-66-36-2
Carreno Busta P.[13]
Gasquet R.
6-32-66-3
Klahn B.
Marterer M.
7-616-4
Haase R.
Krajinovic F.
4-66-26-3
Zverev M.
Dzumhur D.
6-36-4
Mannarino A.
Cecchinato M.
6-776-27-67
Edmund K.[14]
Mcdonald M.
6-36-2
Shapovalov D.
Tiafoe F.
7-663-67-5
Mayer L.
Mmoh M.
6-41-66-4
Gojowczyk P.
Sousa J.
2-66-47-5
Querrey S.
Isner J.[9]
6-46-757-65
Djokovic N.[10]
Johnson S.
6-47-64