Tristan Lamasine vs Gijs Brouwer — Meerbusch CH Qualifying Round 1

Meerbusch CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
FRA2
Tristan Lamasine
33 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWLLWWLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 13 August 2018
clay
Gijs Brouwer
NED
Gijs Brouwer
#1115ATP
30 yrs · 191 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLLL
Lamasine T.
6-2 4-6 6-1
Brouwer G.
Lamasine T.
6462
Brouwer G.
2611

Tristan Lamasine defeated Gijs Brouwer 6-2 4-6 6-1 in the Meerbusch CH qualifying round 1 on clay. The result followed the form book — Tristan Lamasine came in defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

  • Match story: Tristan Lamasine came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–2 4–6 6–1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Lamasine T.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Brouwer G.

Brouwer G.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Lamasine T.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Lamasine T.Brouwer G.
1st serve in·Even
63%
67%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
51%
Service points won·Even
61%
64%
Return points won·Even
39%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
56%
63%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.7
4.8
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.9
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Lamasine T.Brouwer G.
Clutch Rating·Even
21
19
Break points saved·Dominant
38
92
Break points won·Slight edge
17
6
Deciding sets·Dominant
51
22
Tiebreaks·Dominant
43
3

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Lamasine T.Brouwer G.
Freshness·
—
92

Brouwer G.: 2 days rest · 1 match, 15 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Q3
Sels J.[4]
Tiurnev E.[8]
6-16-2
Kuhn N.[3]
Oliel Y.
6-22-66-2
Sieber M.
Lamasine T.[2]
7-677-5
Bergs Z.
Muller A.[7]
3-66-46-4
Q2
Sieber M.
Oetzbach A.
6-06-0
Muller A.[7]
Saito T.
6-36-0
Tiurnev E.[8]
Avidzba A.
0-66-47-66
Bergs Z.
Bourgue M.[1]
4-2
Sels J.[4]
Chazal M.
4-66-47-64
Oliel Y.
Fanselow S.[6]
6-46-2
Kuhn N.[3]
Brancaccio R.
6-43-67-65
Lamasine T.[2]
Guinard M.
6-46-4
Q1
Oliel Y.
Squire H.
6-36-1
Bergs Z.
Breitbach K.
6-16-1
Muller A.[7]
Warias R.
6-06-2
Oetzbach A.
Toledo Bague P.[5]
6-44-66-2
Lamasine T.[2]
Brouwer G.
6-24-66-1
Guinard M.
Manafov V.
6-26-3
Bourgue M.[1]
Gabashvili T.
6-46-4
Avidzba A.
Kopriva V.
7-603-67-5
Sieber M.
Rosenkranz M.
6-36-3
Tiurnev E.[8]
Slobodchikov R.
1-66-26-2
Chazal M.
Pena Lopez M.
4-66-16-4
Sels J.[4]
Denolly C.
6-16-1
Fanselow S.[6]
Barranco Cosano J.
5-76-46-4
Brancaccio R.
Lenz J.
6-16-2
Kuhn N.[3]
Merckx J.
7-56-4
Saito T.
Haerteis J.
5-2