Raul Brancaccio vs Julian Lenz — Meerbusch CH Qualifying Round 1

Meerbusch CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
Raul Brancaccio
ITA
Raul Brancaccio
#230ATP
1492ELO
1465Clay ELO
29 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 13 August 2018
clay
GER
Julian Lenz
33 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWWWWWLLW
Brancaccio R.
6-1 6-2
Lenz J.
Brancaccio R.
662
Lenz J.
120

Raul Brancaccio defeated Julian Lenz 6-1 6-2 in the Meerbusch CH qualifying round 1 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Brancaccio R.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Lenz J.

Lenz J.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Brancaccio R.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Brancaccio R.Lenz J.
1st serve in·Even
61%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
48%
Service points won·Even
59%
61%
Return points won·Even
42%
38%
Break points saved·Even
58%
56%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.5
5.1
Double faults / match·Even
3.9
3.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 171). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Brancaccio R.Lenz J.
Clutch Rating·Even
11
12
Break points saved·Slight edge
49
40
Break points won·Slight edge
19
13
Deciding sets·Dominant
9
39
Tiebreaks·Dominant
51
23

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Brancaccio R.Lenz J.
Freshness·
62
—

Brancaccio R.: 3 days rest · 3 matches, 78 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Q3
Sels J.[4]
Tiurnev E.[8]
6-16-2
Kuhn N.[3]
Oliel Y.
6-22-66-2
Sieber M.
Lamasine T.[2]
7-677-5
Bergs Z.
Muller A.[7]
3-66-46-4
Q2
Sieber M.
Oetzbach A.
6-06-0
Muller A.[7]
Saito T.
6-36-0
Tiurnev E.[8]
Avidzba A.
0-66-47-66
Bergs Z.
Bourgue M.[1]
4-2
Sels J.[4]
Chazal M.
4-66-47-64
Oliel Y.
Fanselow S.[6]
6-46-2
Kuhn N.[3]
Brancaccio R.
6-43-67-65
Lamasine T.[2]
Guinard M.
6-46-4
Q1
Oliel Y.
Squire H.
6-36-1
Bergs Z.
Breitbach K.
6-16-1
Muller A.[7]
Warias R.
6-06-2
Oetzbach A.
Toledo Bague P.[5]
6-44-66-2
Lamasine T.[2]
Brouwer G.
6-24-66-1
Guinard M.
Manafov V.
6-26-3
Bourgue M.[1]
Gabashvili T.
6-46-4
Avidzba A.
Kopriva V.
7-603-67-5
Sieber M.
Rosenkranz M.
6-36-3
Tiurnev E.[8]
Slobodchikov R.
1-66-26-2
Chazal M.
Pena Lopez M.
4-66-16-4
Sels J.[4]
Denolly C.
6-16-1
Fanselow S.[6]
Barranco Cosano J.
5-76-46-4
Brancaccio R.
Lenz J.
6-16-2
Kuhn N.[3]
Merckx J.
7-56-4
Saito T.
Haerteis J.
5-2