Nicola Kuhn vs Raul Brancaccio — Meerbusch CH Qualifying Round 2

Meerbusch CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 2
GER3
Nicola Kuhn
#1540ATP
26 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLLWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 13 August 2018
clay
Raul Brancaccio
ITA
Raul Brancaccio
#230ATP
1492ELO
1465Clay ELO
29 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWLLLW
Kuhn N.
6-4 3-6 7-6
Brancaccio R.
Kuhn N.
63772
Brancaccio R.
46651

Nicola Kuhn defeated Raul Brancaccio 6-4 3-6 7-6 in the Meerbusch CH qualifying round 2 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Nicola Kuhn closed it out in three sets, 6–4 3–6 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kuhn N.serving61% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Brancaccio R.

Brancaccio R.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Kuhn N.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kuhn N.Brancaccio R.
1st serve in·Even
61%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
47%
Service points won·Even
60%
59%
Return points won·Even
39%
42%
Break points saved·Even
59%
58%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.2
2.5
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.3
3.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kuhn N.Brancaccio R.
Clutch Rating·Even
14
11
Break points saved·Slight edge
56
49
Break points won·Even
17
19
Deciding sets·Even
10
9
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
57
51

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Kuhn N.Brancaccio R.
Freshness·
—
62

Brancaccio R.: 3 days rest · 3 matches, 78 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Q3
Sels J.[4]
Tiurnev E.[8]
6-16-2
Kuhn N.[3]
Oliel Y.
6-22-66-2
Sieber M.
Lamasine T.[2]
7-677-5
Bergs Z.
Muller A.[7]
3-66-46-4
Q2
Sieber M.
Oetzbach A.
6-06-0
Muller A.[7]
Saito T.
6-36-0
Tiurnev E.[8]
Avidzba A.
0-66-47-66
Bergs Z.
Bourgue M.[1]
4-2
Sels J.[4]
Chazal M.
4-66-47-64
Oliel Y.
Fanselow S.[6]
6-46-2
Kuhn N.[3]
Brancaccio R.
6-43-67-65
Lamasine T.[2]
Guinard M.
6-46-4
Q1
Oliel Y.
Squire H.
6-36-1
Bergs Z.
Breitbach K.
6-16-1
Muller A.[7]
Warias R.
6-06-2
Oetzbach A.
Toledo Bague P.[5]
6-44-66-2
Lamasine T.[2]
Brouwer G.
6-24-66-1
Guinard M.
Manafov V.
6-26-3
Bourgue M.[1]
Gabashvili T.
6-46-4
Avidzba A.
Kopriva V.
7-603-67-5
Sieber M.
Rosenkranz M.
6-36-3
Tiurnev E.[8]
Slobodchikov R.
1-66-26-2
Chazal M.
Pena Lopez M.
4-66-16-4
Sels J.[4]
Denolly C.
6-16-1
Fanselow S.[6]
Barranco Cosano J.
5-76-46-4
Brancaccio R.
Lenz J.
6-16-2
Kuhn N.[3]
Merckx J.
7-56-4
Saito T.
Haerteis J.
5-2