Zizou Bergs vs Mathias Bourgue — Meerbusch CH Qualifying Round 2

Meerbusch CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 2
Zizou Bergs
BEL
Zizou Bergs
#35ATP
1808ELO
1696Clay ELO
$995kYTD
$4.0MCAREER
27 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWWLL
0 — 0
Sets
Retired
Monday, 13 August 2018
clay
FRA1
Mathias Bourgue
#2057ATP
32 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLLW
Bergs Z.
4-2
Bourgue M.
Bergs Z.
4–
Bourgue M.
2–

Zizou Bergs advanced when Mathias Bourgue retired 4-2 in the Meerbusch CH qualifying round 2. Zizou Bergs extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2024-05-27Roland GarrosQ3clayZizou Bergs6-2 7-6(4)

Serve vs return

This season
Bergs Z.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Bourgue M.

Bourgue M.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Bergs Z.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Bergs Z.Bourgue M.
1st serve in·Even
61%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
51%
Service points won·Even
65%
64%
Return points won·Even
38%
38%
Break points saved·Even
61%
62%
Aces / match·Slight edge
6.7
6.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.5
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Bergs Z.Bourgue M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
69
38
Break points saved·Clear edge
95
81
Break points won·Clear edge
21
2
Deciding sets·Clear edge
92
73
Tiebreaks·Dominant
91
28

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Bergs Z.Bourgue M.
Freshness·
82
—

Bergs Z.: 10 days rest · 3 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Q3
Sels J.[4]
Tiurnev E.[8]
6-16-2
Kuhn N.[3]
Oliel Y.
6-22-66-2
Sieber M.
Lamasine T.[2]
7-677-5
Bergs Z.
Muller A.[7]
3-66-46-4
Q2
Sieber M.
Oetzbach A.
6-06-0
Muller A.[7]
Saito T.
6-36-0
Tiurnev E.[8]
Avidzba A.
0-66-47-66
Bergs Z.
Bourgue M.[1]
4-2
Sels J.[4]
Chazal M.
4-66-47-64
Oliel Y.
Fanselow S.[6]
6-46-2
Kuhn N.[3]
Brancaccio R.
6-43-67-65
Lamasine T.[2]
Guinard M.
6-46-4
Q1
Oliel Y.
Squire H.
6-36-1
Bergs Z.
Breitbach K.
6-16-1
Muller A.[7]
Warias R.
6-06-2
Oetzbach A.
Toledo Bague P.[5]
6-44-66-2
Lamasine T.[2]
Brouwer G.
6-24-66-1
Guinard M.
Manafov V.
6-26-3
Bourgue M.[1]
Gabashvili T.
6-46-4
Avidzba A.
Kopriva V.
7-603-67-5
Sieber M.
Rosenkranz M.
6-36-3
Tiurnev E.[8]
Slobodchikov R.
1-66-26-2
Chazal M.
Pena Lopez M.
4-66-16-4
Sels J.[4]
Denolly C.
6-16-1
Fanselow S.[6]
Barranco Cosano J.
5-76-46-4
Brancaccio R.
Lenz J.
6-16-2
Kuhn N.[3]
Merckx J.
7-56-4
Saito T.
Haerteis J.
5-2