Facundo Bagnis vs Matteo Viola — Cordenons CH Round of 32

Cordenons CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ARG2
Facundo Bagnis
#431ATP
1591ELO
1584Clay ELO
36 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 13 August 2018
clay
ITA
Matteo Viola
39 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLLLL
Bagnis F.
6-0 6-2
Viola M.
Bagnis F.
662
Viola M.
020

Facundo Bagnis defeated Matteo Viola 6-0 6-2 in the Cordenons CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Matteo Viola came in defending last year's round of 32, but Facundo Bagnis had been the form player, winning 5 of their last 8 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Bagnis F.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Viola M.

Viola M.serving59% hold

wins 53% of points on serve vs Bagnis F.

Serve advantage — Bagnis F.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Bagnis F.Viola M.
1st serve in·Even
63%
67%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
70%
62%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
51%
46%
Service points won·Slight edge
63%
57%
Return points won·Even
40%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
62%
54%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.5
1.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.7
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (198 vs 193). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Bagnis F.Viola M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
54
8
Break points saved·Dominant
92
20
Break points won·Slight edge
35
25
Deciding sets·Dominant
89
15
Tiebreaks·Dominant
3
70

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Lorenzi P.[1]
Valkusz M.
6-33-66-4
Semi-finals
Valkusz M.
Clezar G.[7]
6-26-4
Lorenzi P.[1]
Domingues J.
7-697-5
Quarter-finals
Domingues J.
Couacaud E.
6-26-1
Clezar G.[7]
Bagnis F.[2]
6-44-66-2
Valkusz M.
Kolar Z.[6]
6-06-0
Lorenzi P.[1]
Robredo T.[5]
6-36-3
R16
Bagnis F.[2]
Pellegrino A.
7-57-5
Clezar G.[7]
Cachin P.
6-26-4
Kolar Z.[6]
Forti F.
6-16-4
Robredo T.[5]
Dalla Valle E.
6-30-0
Couacaud E.
Basso A.
4-67-666-3
Domingues J.
Martin A.[3]
6-43-66-1
Lorenzi P.[1]
Bega A.
6-46-3
Valkusz M.
Eriksson M.
6-06-1
R32
Bagnis F.[2]
Viola M.
6-06-2
Pellegrino A.
Grigelis L.
6-776-26-4
Cachin P.
Berrettini J.
3-66-16-2
Clezar G.[7]
Balzerani R.
6-27-5
Eriksson M.
Serdarusic N.[4]
6-36-1
Valkusz M.
Oliveira G.
6-46-4
Couacaud E.
Mager G.
6-46-1
Dalla Valle E.
Zekic M.
6-27-5
Robredo T.[5]
Giustino L.
7-636-1
Kolar Z.[6]
Gomez Herrera C.
6-36-4
Martin A.[3]
Setkic A.
6-767-56-3
Forti F.
Dutra Da Silva D.
7-51-65-0
Basso A.
Munoz de la Nava D.
7-617-5
Bega A.
Bonadio R.
2-66-26-1
Lorenzi P.[1]
Diez S.
7-57-65
Domingues J.
Casanova H.
6-06-2