Matteo Viola vs Sergiy Stakhovsky — Segovia CH Round of 32

Segovia CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ITA
Matteo Viola
39 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 30 July 2018
hard
UKR1
Sergiy Stakhovsky
40 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWWLLW
Viola M.
6-3 2-6 7-6
Stakhovsky S.
Viola M.
62772
Stakhovsky S.
36651

Matteo Viola defeated Sergiy Stakhovsky 6-3 2-6 7-6 in the Segovia CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Sergiy Stakhovsky came in defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

  • Match story: Matteo Viola closed it out in three sets, 6–3 2–6 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Viola M.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Stakhovsky S.

Stakhovsky S.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Viola M.

Serve advantage — Stakhovsky S.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Viola M.Stakhovsky S.
1st serve in·Slight edge
67%
60%
1st serve points won·Clear edge
62%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
48%
Service points won·Slight edge
57%
64%
Return points won·Even
40%
36%
Break points saved·Slight edge
54%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
1.2
7.3
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.5
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (193 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Viola M.Stakhovsky S.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
8
40
Break points saved·Dominant
20
88
Break points won·Clear edge
25
3
Deciding sets·Dominant
15
57
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
70
59

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Humbert U.[7]
Menendez Maceiras A.[2]
6-36-4
Semi-finals
Menendez Maceiras A.[2]
Arnaboldi A.[4]
7-667-65
Humbert U.[7]
Vanni L.[3]
7-656-4
Quarter-finals
Vanni L.[3]
Moroni G.
6-16-4
Humbert U.[7]
Quiroz R.
6-25-77-67
Menendez Maceiras A.[2]
Artunedo Martinavarro A.
7-637-66
Arnaboldi A.[4]
Brands D.[6]
4-66-37-65
R16
Moroni G.
Nedelko I.
6-46-716-3
Quiroz R.
Viola M.
7-57-5
Arnaboldi A.[4]
Setkic A.
6-36-3
Artunedo Martinavarro A.
Neuchrist M.
6-15-2
Menendez Maceiras A.[2]
Ilkel C.
6-06-2
Humbert U.[7]
Monteiro J.
6-16-3
Brands D.[6]
Ly N.
6-26-4
Vanni L.[3]
Baldi F.
6-43-66-4
R32
Neuchrist M.
Pavic A.
6-37-64
Menendez Maceiras A.[2]
Jankovits Y.
6-46-2
Arnaboldi A.[4]
Semmler M.
4-67-57-5
Setkic A.
Brkic T.
7-56-3
Vanni L.[3]
Davidovich Fokina A.
6-14-66-4
Monteiro J.
Heyman C.
6-46-4
Humbert U.[7]
Ortega Olmedo R.
4-66-36-2
Artunedo Martinavarro A.
Griekspoor S.[5]
3-66-17-63
Viola M.
Stakhovsky S.[1]
6-32-67-65
Baldi F.
Gomez Herrera C.
7-667-63
Moroni G.
Guez D.
6-36-2
Nedelko I.
Maamoun K.
6-36-4
Brands D.[6]
Romero De Avila Senise A.
6-46-2
Ly N.
Doumbia S.
6-26-1
Ilkel C.
Ruano J.
6-46-3
Quiroz R.
Boluda Purkiss C.
4-66-46-4