Lloyd Harris vs Stefano Napolitano — Lexington CH Final

Lexington CH · CHALLENGER · Final
Lloyd Harris
RSA6
Lloyd Harris
#160ATP
1665ELO
1640Hard ELO
$130kYTD
$4.7MCAREER
29 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 30 July 2018
hard
Stefano Napolitano
ITA8
Stefano Napolitano
#242ATP
1528ELO
1456Hard ELO
31 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLLWWWL
Harris L.
6-4 6-3
Napolitano S.
Harris L.
662
Napolitano S.
430

Lloyd Harris defeated Stefano Napolitano 6-4 6-3 in the Lexington CH final on hard. The result followed the form book — Lloyd Harris came in ranked #160, defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

  • Match story: Lloyd Harris closed it out in two sets, 6–4 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Harris L.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Napolitano S.

Napolitano S.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Harris L.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Harris L.Napolitano S.
1st serve in·Even
64%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
76%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
52%
Service points won·Even
67%
63%
Return points won·Even
36%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
64%
58%
Aces / match·Dominant
11.4
4.8
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.0
1.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Harris L.Napolitano S.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
57
33
Break points saved·Clear edge
95
77
Break points won·Slight edge
24
13
Deciding sets·Dominant
94
55
Tiebreaks·Even
25
26

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Harris L.Napolitano S.
Freshness·
—
100

Napolitano S.: 18 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Harris L.[6]
Napolitano S.[8]
6-46-3
Semi-finals
Harris L.[6]
De Loore J.
6-16-3
Napolitano S.[8]
Chung Y.
7-56-3
Quarter-finals
Chung Y.
Clarke J.[7]
6-33-0
Harris L.[6]
Schneider R.
6-36-2
De Loore J.
Altamirano C.
3-66-33-2
Napolitano S.[8]
Gojo B.
6-46-4
R16
Schneider R.
Myneni S.
5-4
Altamirano C.
Menezes J.
6-36-4
Napolitano S.[8]
Ward A.
6-32-66-3
Chung Y.
Wolf J.
6-36-797-5
Clarke J.[7]
Harris A.
6-36-3
Gojo B.
Jomby T.
7-54-67-66
Harris L.[6]
Uchida K.
6-46-4
De Loore J.
Polmans M.[2]
1-66-36-4
R32
Harris A.
Torpegaard M.
7-607-64
Menezes J.
Purcell M.[5]
6-16-4
De Loore J.
Barrios Vera T.
1-67-646-4
Myneni S.
Gombos N.[3]
7-57-65
Uchida K.
Kelly D.
6-26-4
Harris L.[6]
Uchiyama Y.
6-46-4
Napolitano S.[8]
Rybakov A.
6-46-3
Ward A.
Riffice S.
6-36-1
Jomby T.
Catarina L.
6-27-65
Gojo B.
Broady L.[4]
6-47-64
Chung Y.
Bushamuka W.
6-26-3
Wolf J.
Evans D.
6-07-65
Schneider R.
Sijsling I.
6-26-4
Polmans M.[2]
Bega A.
6-46-0
Altamirano C.
Grenier H.
6-747-626-4
Clarke J.[7]
Leshem E.
6-46-4