Pedro Cachin vs Kamil Majchrzak — Sopot CH Round of 32

Sopot CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ARG
Pedro Cachin
#1328ATP
31 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWLLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 30 July 2018
clay
Kamil Majchrzak
POL
Kamil Majchrzak
#66ATP
1801ELO
1723Clay ELO
$617kYTD
$3.8MCAREER
30 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWWWLW
Cachin P.
7-6 6-1
Majchrzak K.
Cachin P.
7762
Majchrzak K.
6210

Pedro Cachin defeated Kamil Majchrzak 7-6 6-1 in the Sopot CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Kamil Majchrzak came in ranked #66.

Key context

  • Match story: Pedro Cachin came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 7–6 6–1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Cachin P.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Majchrzak K.

Majchrzak K.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Cachin P.

Serve advantage — Majchrzak K.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Cachin P.Majchrzak K.
1st serve in·Even
63%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
53%
Service points won·Even
62%
65%
Return points won·Even
39%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
58%
65%
Aces / match·Even
4.9
5.4
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.1
1.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Cachin P.Majchrzak K.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
22
68
Break points saved·Clear edge
77
97
Break points won·Dominant
21
51
Deciding sets·Dominant
11
73
Tiebreaks·Dominant
46
75

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Cachin P.Majchrzak K.
Freshness·
—
92

Majchrzak K.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Lorenzi P.[2]
Gimeno Traver D.[8]
7-626-756-3
Semi-finals
Gimeno Traver D.[8]
Cachin P.
7-56-1
Lorenzi P.[2]
Kolar Z.
6-46-0
Quarter-finals
Kolar Z.
Janvier M.
6-42-67-5
Lorenzi P.[2]
Otte O.[6]
3-66-36-2
Cachin P.
De Bakker T.
6-33-66-2
Gimeno Traver D.[8]
Robredo T.
6-47-64
R16
Janvier M.
Marcora R.
6-16-3
Robredo T.
Dellien H.[1]
6-23-66-3
Lorenzi P.[2]
Choinski J.
7-56-0
Kolar Z.
Vatutin A.[7]
6-36-3
Cachin P.
Smirnov A.
7-56-2
De Bakker T.
Mager G.
6-46-1
Gimeno Traver D.[8]
Michalski D.
6-16-1
Otte O.[6]
Cias P.
6-25-77-5
R32
Lorenzi P.[2]
Kuhn N.
6-36-0
Choinski J.
Sakharov G.
0-66-46-1
Vatutin A.[7]
Cuevas M.
7-646-3
De Bakker T.
Moraing M.[5]
7-646-2
Mager G.
Bellucci T.
6-46-2
Smirnov A.
Ruud C.[4]
6-21-67-5
Dellien H.[1]
Manafov V.
7-53-0
Cachin P.
Majchrzak K.
7-626-1
Gimeno Traver D.[8]
Marek W.
7-56-4
Otte O.[6]
Horansky F.
7-56-0
Robredo T.
Nedovyesov A.
7-53-66-1
Marcora R.
Kuzmanov D.
6-36-3
Janvier M.
Zekic M.
6-36-1
Kolar Z.
Lamasine T.
3-66-36-3
Cias P.
Collarini A.
7-666-3
Michalski D.
Dembek M.
6-26-4