Marco Trungelliti vs Cem Ilkel — Tampere CH Round of 32

Tampere CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Marco Trungelliti
ARG4
Marco Trungelliti
#99ATP
1627ELO
1621Clay ELO
$395kYTD
$2.6MCAREER
36 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLLWLWLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 23 July 2018
clay
Cem Ilkel
TUR
Cem Ilkel
#1462ATP
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLWL
Trungelliti M.
3-6 6-3 6-4
Ilkel C.
Trungelliti M.
3662
Ilkel C.
6341

Marco Trungelliti defeated Cem Ilkel 3-6 6-3 6-4 in the Tampere CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Marco Trungelliti came in ranked #99.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Trungelliti M.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Ilkel C.

Ilkel C.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Trungelliti M.

Serve advantage — Trungelliti M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Trungelliti M.Ilkel C.
1st serve in·Even
59%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Even
61%
62%
Return points won·Even
40%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
62%
57%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.4
4.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.3
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Trungelliti M.Ilkel C.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
50
32
Break points saved·Dominant
87
49
Break points won·Clear edge
24
3
Deciding sets·Clear edge
87
70
Tiebreaks·Dominant
19
66

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Trungelliti M.Ilkel C.
Freshness·
89
—

Trungelliti M.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 17 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Griekspoor T.[6]
Londero J.[3]
6-32-66-3
Semi-finals
Griekspoor T.[6]
Lamasine T.
6-47-5
Londero J.[3]
Dellien H.[1]
6-46-2
Quarter-finals
Dellien H.[1]
Majchrzak K.[5]
6-756-36-1
Lamasine T.
De Bakker T.
7-626-1
Griekspoor T.[6]
Trungelliti M.[4]
6-36-3
Londero J.[3]
Hoang A.[7]
7-656-4
R16
Lamasine T.
Baldi F.
6-47-5
Griekspoor T.[6]
Cuevas M.
6-46-4
Hoang A.[7]
Gakhov I.
7-52-66-1
Dellien H.[1]
Sels J.
6-47-5
Majchrzak K.[5]
Bellotti R.
6-06-1
Londero J.[3]
Marcora R.
3-66-46-2
De Bakker T.
Benchetrit E.
6-43-66-1
Trungelliti M.[4]
Coppejans K.
7-656-747-5
R32
Londero J.[3]
Ortega Olmedo R.
6-17-5
Bellotti R.
Gomez Herrera C.
3-2
Dellien H.[1]
Raisma K.
6-34-1
Benchetrit E.
Sousa P.[2]
6-36-2
Trungelliti M.[4]
Ilkel C.
3-66-36-4
Coppejans K.
Souza J.
6-36-4
Gakhov I.
Niklas Salminen P.
6-27-65
Marcora R.
Ruusuvuori E.
6-36-4
Majchrzak K.[5]
Heras P.
6-16-4
Hoang A.[7]
Heliovaara H.
6-06-4
De Bakker T.
Kuhn N.
7-656-1
Lamasine T.
Vilella Martinez M.
6-34-3
Griekspoor T.[6]
Blancaneaux G.
6-16-3
Sels J.
Collarini A.
6-46-3
Baldi F.
Sakharov G.[8]
7-616-2
Cuevas M.
Cachin P.
6-34-66-3