Tak Khunn Wang vs Moez Echargui — Prague CH Qualifying Round 2

Prague CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 2
FRA
Tak Khunn Wang
34 yrs · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWWWLWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 23 July 2018
clay
Moez Echargui
TUN5
Moez Echargui
#151ATP
1416ELO
1342Clay ELO
$171kYTD
$469kCAREER
33 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLLLL
Wang T.
6-1 7-5
Echargui M.
Wang T.
672
Echargui M.
150

Tak Khunn Wang defeated Moez Echargui 6-1 7-5 in the Prague CH qualifying round 2 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Tak Khunn Wang came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 7–5.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Wang T.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Echargui M.

Echargui M.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Wang T.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Wang T.Echargui M.
1st serve in·Even
55%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
49%
Service points won·Even
61%
59%
Return points won·Even
40%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
62%
57%
Aces / match·Even
3.0
3.3
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.5
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (88 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Wang T.Echargui M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
39
4
Break points saved·Slight edge
59
48
Break points won·Dominant
44
11
Deciding sets·Dominant
60
4
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
33
42

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Wang T.Echargui M.
Freshness·
—
100

Echargui M.: 19 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Q3
Horansky F.[1]
Nouza P.
6-16-4
Sieber M.[6]
Torebko P.[3]
6-16-4
Nejedly P.
Ursu V.
6-35-0
Van Rijthoven T.
Wang T.
3-66-36-2
Q2
Ursu V.
Konecny M.
7-662-66-2
Wang T.
Echargui M.[5]
6-17-5
Horansky F.[1]
Kopriva V.
6-46-1
Torebko P.[3]
Avidzba A.
0-67-56-4
Nejedly P.
Poljak D.[7]
6-27-5
Sieber M.[6]
Kellovsky D.
6-37-66
Van Rijthoven T.
Cias P.[2]
7-57-5
Nouza P.
Stanek R.
5-76-26-4
Q1
Nejedly P.
Cungu R.
6-26-1
Avidzba A.
Styler O.
6-17-65
Kopriva V.
Celebic L.
6-16-4
Kellovsky D.
Uzhylovsky V.
3-66-26-3
Nouza P.
Puodziunas S.
6-06-3
Sieber M.[6]
Perchicot M.
1-66-26-3
Wang T.
Davydenko P.
7-54-67-5
Horansky F.[1]
Laurent Y.
6-06-2
Poljak D.[7]
Gengel M.
2-66-36-4
Konecny M.
Paty D.
6-16-4
Ursu V.
Doumbia S.[4]
6-756-46-4
Torebko P.[3]
Martineau M.
2-66-37-5
Echargui M.[5]
Haliak M.
4-66-16-1
Van Rijthoven T.
Damm M.
6-36-4
Stanek R.
Kestelboim M.[8]
7-56-0