Tim Van Rijthoven vs Martin Damm — Prague CH Qualifying Round 1

Prague CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
NED
Tim Van Rijthoven
29 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 23 July 2018
clay
Martin Damm
USA
Martin Damm
#104ATP
1706ELO
1535Clay ELO
$338kYTD
$910kCAREER
22 yrs · 203 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWWL
Van Rijthoven T.
6-3 6-4
Damm M.
Van Rijthoven T.
662
Damm M.
340

Tim Van Rijthoven defeated Martin Damm 6-3 6-4 in the Prague CH qualifying round 1 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Van Rijthoven T.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Damm M.

Damm M.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Van Rijthoven T.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Van Rijthoven T.Damm M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
64%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
76%
78%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
50%
Service points won·Even
68%
67%
Return points won·Even
34%
34%
Break points saved·Even
65%
65%
Aces / match·Clear edge
9.8
11.9
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.5
4.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (167 vs 172). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Van Rijthoven T.Damm M.
Clutch Rating·Even
26
26
Break points saved·Even
90
93
Break points won·Even
1
1
Deciding sets·Clear edge
19
5
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
61
84

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Van Rijthoven T.Damm M.
Freshness·
—
97

Damm M.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Q3
Horansky F.[1]
Nouza P.
6-16-4
Sieber M.[6]
Torebko P.[3]
6-16-4
Nejedly P.
Ursu V.
6-35-0
Van Rijthoven T.
Wang T.
3-66-36-2
Q2
Ursu V.
Konecny M.
7-662-66-2
Wang T.
Echargui M.[5]
6-17-5
Horansky F.[1]
Kopriva V.
6-46-1
Torebko P.[3]
Avidzba A.
0-67-56-4
Nejedly P.
Poljak D.[7]
6-27-5
Sieber M.[6]
Kellovsky D.
6-37-66
Van Rijthoven T.
Cias P.[2]
7-57-5
Nouza P.
Stanek R.
5-76-26-4
Q1
Nejedly P.
Cungu R.
6-26-1
Avidzba A.
Styler O.
6-17-65
Kopriva V.
Celebic L.
6-16-4
Kellovsky D.
Uzhylovsky V.
3-66-26-3
Nouza P.
Puodziunas S.
6-06-3
Sieber M.[6]
Perchicot M.
1-66-26-3
Wang T.
Davydenko P.
7-54-67-5
Horansky F.[1]
Laurent Y.
6-06-2
Poljak D.[7]
Gengel M.
2-66-36-4
Konecny M.
Paty D.
6-16-4
Ursu V.
Doumbia S.[4]
6-756-46-4
Torebko P.[3]
Martineau M.
2-66-37-5
Echargui M.[5]
Haliak M.
4-66-16-1
Van Rijthoven T.
Damm M.
6-36-4
Stanek R.
Kestelboim M.[8]
7-56-0