Yannick Maden vs Lukas Rosol — Scheveningen CH Semi-final

Scheveningen CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
GER1
Yannick Maden
36 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 16 July 2018
clay
CZE
Lukas Rosol
40 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLLLLLLL
Maden Y.
6-3 6-4
Rosol L.
Maden Y.
662
Rosol L.
340

Yannick Maden defeated Lukas Rosol 6-3 6-4 in the Scheveningen CH semi-final on clay. The result followed the form book — Yannick Maden came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Yannick Maden extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Yannick Maden closed it out in two sets, 6–3 6–4.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2019-04-29MunichQ2clayYannick Maden6-2 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Maden Y.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Rosol L.

Rosol L.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Maden Y.

Serve advantage — Maden Y.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Maden Y.Rosol L.
1st serve in·Even
61%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
66%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
49%
Service points won·Even
60%
62%
Return points won·Even
40%
36%
Break points saved·Even
58%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.6
4.6
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.1
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Maden Y.Rosol L.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
30
51
Break points saved·Clear edge
70
89
Break points won·Dominant
39
3
Deciding sets·Dominant
20
78
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
54
72

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
De Bakker T.
Maden Y.[1]
6-26-1
Semi-finals
Maden Y.[1]
Rosol L.
6-36-4
De Bakker T.
Coppejans K.
6-16-4
Quarter-finals
De Bakker T.
Giannessi A.
3-67-676-4
Coppejans K.
Otte O.[4]
7-56-4
Maden Y.[1]
Balazs A.[7]
6-26-776-3
Rosol L.
Rola B.
6-46-766-4
R16
Rola B.
Zapata Miralles B.
6-46-4
De Bakker T.
Ignatik U.
6-47-64
Giannessi A.
Brown D.
4-66-26-3
Rosol L.
Kamke T.
4-67-646-4
Balazs A.[7]
Kuhn N.
6-36-4
Maden Y.[1]
Netuschil M.
6-36-1
Coppejans K.
Hoang A.
6-36-2
Otte O.[4]
Van De Zandschulp B.
7-616-4
R32
Zapata Miralles B.
Benchetrit E.
7-56-1
De Bakker T.
Pavlasek A.[2]
6-767-636-3
Ignatik U.
Brouwer G.
6-36-0
Giannessi A.
Yang T.
3-66-16-3
Otte O.[4]
Oliveira G.
7-656-2
Van De Zandschulp B.
Choinski J.
7-56-2
Hoang A.
Donati M.[5]
6-46-3
Kamke T.
Jahn J.
6-43-67-65
Rola B.
Moraing M.[3]
6-36-2
Balazs A.[7]
Sels J.
6-37-63
Kuhn N.
Harris L.
6-16-716-3
Netuschil M.
Van Rijthoven T.
6-36-3
Maden Y.[1]
Davidovich Fokina A.
7-646-1
Coppejans K.
Griekspoor S.
2-66-46-3
Brown D.
Barrere G.[8]
7-57-5
Rosol L.
Safranek V.
6-36-2