Lukas Rosol vs Tobias Kamke — Scheveningen CH Round of 16

Scheveningen CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
CZE
Lukas Rosol
40 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLLLLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 16 July 2018
clay
GER
Tobias Kamke
40 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLWLWL
Rosol L.
4-6 7-6 6-4
Kamke T.
Rosol L.
47762
Kamke T.
66441

Lukas Rosol defeated Tobias Kamke 4-6 7-6 6-4 in the Scheveningen CH round of 16 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Tobias Kamke came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Lukas Rosol claimed a first win over Tobias Kamke in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2013-07-15HamburgR64clayTobias Kamke6-3 6-0

Serve vs return

This season
Rosol L.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Kamke T.

Kamke T.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Rosol L.

Serve advantage — Kamke T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Rosol L.Kamke T.
1st serve in·Even
62%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
50%
Service points won·Even
62%
61%
Return points won·Even
36%
39%
Break points saved·Even
60%
58%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.6
1.8
Double faults / match·Even
3.3
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 193). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Rosol L.Kamke T.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
51
14
Break points saved·Clear edge
89
69
Break points won·Clear edge
3
22
Deciding sets·Dominant
78
17
Tiebreaks·Dominant
72
7

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
De Bakker T.
Maden Y.[1]
6-26-1
Semi-finals
Maden Y.[1]
Rosol L.
6-36-4
De Bakker T.
Coppejans K.
6-16-4
Quarter-finals
De Bakker T.
Giannessi A.
3-67-676-4
Coppejans K.
Otte O.[4]
7-56-4
Maden Y.[1]
Balazs A.[7]
6-26-776-3
Rosol L.
Rola B.
6-46-766-4
R16
Rola B.
Zapata Miralles B.
6-46-4
De Bakker T.
Ignatik U.
6-47-64
Giannessi A.
Brown D.
4-66-26-3
Rosol L.
Kamke T.
4-67-646-4
Balazs A.[7]
Kuhn N.
6-36-4
Maden Y.[1]
Netuschil M.
6-36-1
Coppejans K.
Hoang A.
6-36-2
Otte O.[4]
Van De Zandschulp B.
7-616-4
R32
Zapata Miralles B.
Benchetrit E.
7-56-1
De Bakker T.
Pavlasek A.[2]
6-767-636-3
Ignatik U.
Brouwer G.
6-36-0
Giannessi A.
Yang T.
3-66-16-3
Otte O.[4]
Oliveira G.
7-656-2
Van De Zandschulp B.
Choinski J.
7-56-2
Hoang A.
Donati M.[5]
6-46-3
Kamke T.
Jahn J.
6-43-67-65
Rola B.
Moraing M.[3]
6-36-2
Balazs A.[7]
Sels J.
6-37-63
Kuhn N.
Harris L.
6-16-716-3
Netuschil M.
Van Rijthoven T.
6-36-3
Maden Y.[1]
Davidovich Fokina A.
7-646-1
Coppejans K.
Griekspoor S.
2-66-46-3
Brown D.
Barrere G.[8]
7-57-5
Rosol L.
Safranek V.
6-36-2