Thiemo De Bakker vs Kimmer Coppejans — Scheveningen CH Semi-final

Scheveningen CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
NED
Thiemo De Bakker
37 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 16 July 2018
clay
Kimmer Coppejans
BEL
Kimmer Coppejans
#199ATP
1544ELO
1513Clay ELO
32 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWWWLWLLW
De Bakker T.
6-1 6-4
Coppejans K.
De Bakker T.
662
Coppejans K.
140

Thiemo De Bakker defeated Kimmer Coppejans 6-1 6-4 in the Scheveningen CH semi-final on clay. The result followed the form book — Thiemo De Bakker came in defending last year's semi-final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
De Bakker T.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Coppejans K.

Coppejans K.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs De Bakker T.

Serve advantage — Coppejans K.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
De Bakker T.Coppejans K.
1st serve in·Even
61%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
49%
Service points won·Even
62%
61%
Return points won·Slight edge
36%
42%
Break points saved·Slight edge
65%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.8
3.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.6
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (58 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
De Bakker T.Coppejans K.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
38
44
Break points saved·Clear edge
86
67
Break points won·Clear edge
7
29
Deciding sets·Dominant
43
74
Tiebreaks·Dominant
70
43

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
De Bakker T.Coppejans K.
Freshness·
—
76

Coppejans K.: 3 days rest · 4 matches, 73 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
De Bakker T.
Maden Y.[1]
6-26-1
Semi-finals
Maden Y.[1]
Rosol L.
6-36-4
De Bakker T.
Coppejans K.
6-16-4
Quarter-finals
De Bakker T.
Giannessi A.
3-67-676-4
Coppejans K.
Otte O.[4]
7-56-4
Maden Y.[1]
Balazs A.[7]
6-26-776-3
Rosol L.
Rola B.
6-46-766-4
R16
Rola B.
Zapata Miralles B.
6-46-4
De Bakker T.
Ignatik U.
6-47-64
Giannessi A.
Brown D.
4-66-26-3
Rosol L.
Kamke T.
4-67-646-4
Balazs A.[7]
Kuhn N.
6-36-4
Maden Y.[1]
Netuschil M.
6-36-1
Coppejans K.
Hoang A.
6-36-2
Otte O.[4]
Van De Zandschulp B.
7-616-4
R32
Zapata Miralles B.
Benchetrit E.
7-56-1
De Bakker T.
Pavlasek A.[2]
6-767-636-3
Ignatik U.
Brouwer G.
6-36-0
Giannessi A.
Yang T.
3-66-16-3
Otte O.[4]
Oliveira G.
7-656-2
Van De Zandschulp B.
Choinski J.
7-56-2
Hoang A.
Donati M.[5]
6-46-3
Kamke T.
Jahn J.
6-43-67-65
Rola B.
Moraing M.[3]
6-36-2
Balazs A.[7]
Sels J.
6-37-63
Kuhn N.
Harris L.
6-16-716-3
Netuschil M.
Van Rijthoven T.
6-36-3
Maden Y.[1]
Davidovich Fokina A.
7-646-1
Coppejans K.
Griekspoor S.
2-66-46-3
Brown D.
Barrere G.[8]
7-57-5
Rosol L.
Safranek V.
6-36-2