Corentin Moutet vs Luca Margaroli — Marburg CH Qualifying Round 1

Marburg CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
Corentin Moutet
FRA1
Corentin Moutet
#40ATP
1745ELO
1692Clay ELO
$731kYTD
$6.4MCAREER
27 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 2 July 2018
clay
SUI
Luca Margaroli
34 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLWL
Moutet C.
6-3 6-7 6-1
Margaroli L.
Moutet C.
66562
Margaroli L.
37711

Corentin Moutet defeated Luca Margaroli 6-3 6-7 6-1 in the Marburg CH qualifying round 1 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Corentin Moutet came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–3 6–7 6–1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Moutet C.serving81% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Margaroli L.

Margaroli L.serving66% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Moutet C.

Serve advantage — Moutet C.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Moutet C.Margaroli L.
—
Serve
—
64
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Moutet C.Margaroli L.
1st serve in·Even
65%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
67%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
51%
45%
Service points won·Even
61%
59%
Return points won·Slight edge
39%
33%
Break points saved·Slight edge
63%
56%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.7
5.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.3
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 35). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Freshness

Recent load
Moutet C.Margaroli L.
Freshness·
96
—

Moutet C.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Q3
Dima D.
Cuevas M.[7]
7-644-66-3
Lamasine T.
Gaio F.[5]
2-66-36-2
Benchetrit E.
Slobodchikov R.
6-37-5
Bellucci T.[6]
Moutet C.[1]
6-46-4
Q2
Dima D.
Haider Maurer A.
6-46-3
Bellucci T.[6]
Masur D.
6-46-2
Benchetrit E.
Blancaneaux G.[8]
6-26-2
Cuevas M.[7]
Echargui M.
5-76-27-65
Lamasine T.
Netuschil M.
6-23-66-0
Gaio F.[5]
Rodriguez C.
6-747-56-1
Slobodchikov R.
Oliveira G.[2]
6-16-3
Moutet C.[1]
Lindell C.
6-26-2
Q1
Oliveira G.[2]
Cias P.
6-16-3
Gaio F.[5]
Matos R.
6-36-4
Benchetrit E.
Cornea V.
6-46-2
Rodriguez C.
Mantilla F.
6-36-2
Bellucci T.[6]
Borza B.
6-26-0
Cuevas M.[7]
Sorgi J.
6-46-3
Slobodchikov R.
Satral J.
7-626-3
Lindell C.
Von Massow G.
7-657-5
Lamasine T.
Safranek V.[3]
6-42-67-66
Echargui M.
Vankan M.
6-36-3
Haider Maurer A.
Diarra G.
6-37-5
Dima D.
Collarini A.[4]
5-76-16-4
Netuschil M.
Coppejans K.
6-43-66-1
Masur D.
Haerteis J.
6-46-4
Moutet C.[1]
Margaroli L.
6-36-756-1