Tristan Lamasine vs Vaclav Safranek — Marburg CH Qualifying Round 1

Marburg CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
FRA
Tristan Lamasine
33 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWLLWWLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 2 July 2018
clay
CZE3
Vaclav Safranek
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLLL
Lamasine T.
6-4 2-6 7-6
Safranek V.
Lamasine T.
62782
Safranek V.
46661

Tristan Lamasine defeated Vaclav Safranek 6-4 2-6 7-6 in the Marburg CH qualifying round 1 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Vaclav Safranek came in defending last year's round of 16, but Tristan Lamasine had been the form player, winning 3 of their last 4 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Lamasine T.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Safranek V.

Safranek V.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Lamasine T.

Serve advantage — Lamasine T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Lamasine T.Safranek V.
1st serve in·Even
63%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
49%
Service points won·Even
61%
59%
Return points won·Even
39%
36%
Break points saved·Even
56%
59%
Aces / match·Even
2.7
3.1
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.9
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 93). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Lamasine T.Safranek V.
Clutch Rating·Even
21
20
Break points saved·Clear edge
38
55
Break points won·Even
17
14
Deciding sets·Even
51
49
Tiebreaks·Dominant
43
16

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Q3
Dima D.
Cuevas M.[7]
7-644-66-3
Lamasine T.
Gaio F.[5]
2-66-36-2
Benchetrit E.
Slobodchikov R.
6-37-5
Bellucci T.[6]
Moutet C.[1]
6-46-4
Q2
Dima D.
Haider Maurer A.
6-46-3
Bellucci T.[6]
Masur D.
6-46-2
Benchetrit E.
Blancaneaux G.[8]
6-26-2
Cuevas M.[7]
Echargui M.
5-76-27-65
Lamasine T.
Netuschil M.
6-23-66-0
Gaio F.[5]
Rodriguez C.
6-747-56-1
Slobodchikov R.
Oliveira G.[2]
6-16-3
Moutet C.[1]
Lindell C.
6-26-2
Q1
Oliveira G.[2]
Cias P.
6-16-3
Gaio F.[5]
Matos R.
6-36-4
Benchetrit E.
Cornea V.
6-46-2
Rodriguez C.
Mantilla F.
6-36-2
Bellucci T.[6]
Borza B.
6-26-0
Cuevas M.[7]
Sorgi J.
6-46-3
Slobodchikov R.
Satral J.
7-626-3
Lindell C.
Von Massow G.
7-657-5
Lamasine T.
Safranek V.[3]
6-42-67-66
Echargui M.
Vankan M.
6-36-3
Haider Maurer A.
Diarra G.
6-37-5
Dima D.
Collarini A.[4]
5-76-16-4
Netuschil M.
Coppejans K.
6-43-66-1
Masur D.
Haerteis J.
6-46-4
Moutet C.[1]
Margaroli L.
6-36-756-1