Tristan Lamasine vs Federico Gaio — Marburg CH Qualifying Final

Marburg CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Final
FRA
Tristan Lamasine
33 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWLLWWLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 2 July 2018
clay
ITA5
Federico Gaio
34 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWWLWLLL
Lamasine T.
2-6 6-3 6-2
Gaio F.
Lamasine T.
2662
Gaio F.
6321

Tristan Lamasine defeated Federico Gaio 2-6 6-3 6-2 in the Marburg CH qualifying final on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Federico Gaio came in defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Lamasine T.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Gaio F.

Gaio F.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Lamasine T.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Lamasine T.Gaio F.
1st serve in·Slight edge
63%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
49%
Service points won·Even
61%
62%
Return points won·Even
39%
37%
Break points saved·Even
56%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.7
4.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.9
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Lamasine T.Gaio F.
Clutch Rating·Even
21
20
Break points saved·Dominant
38
76
Break points won·Clear edge
17
3
Deciding sets·Slight edge
51
40
Tiebreaks·Dominant
43
7

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Q3
Dima D.
Cuevas M.[7]
7-644-66-3
Lamasine T.
Gaio F.[5]
2-66-36-2
Benchetrit E.
Slobodchikov R.
6-37-5
Bellucci T.[6]
Moutet C.[1]
6-46-4
Q2
Dima D.
Haider Maurer A.
6-46-3
Bellucci T.[6]
Masur D.
6-46-2
Benchetrit E.
Blancaneaux G.[8]
6-26-2
Cuevas M.[7]
Echargui M.
5-76-27-65
Lamasine T.
Netuschil M.
6-23-66-0
Gaio F.[5]
Rodriguez C.
6-747-56-1
Slobodchikov R.
Oliveira G.[2]
6-16-3
Moutet C.[1]
Lindell C.
6-26-2
Q1
Oliveira G.[2]
Cias P.
6-16-3
Gaio F.[5]
Matos R.
6-36-4
Benchetrit E.
Cornea V.
6-46-2
Rodriguez C.
Mantilla F.
6-36-2
Bellucci T.[6]
Borza B.
6-26-0
Cuevas M.[7]
Sorgi J.
6-46-3
Slobodchikov R.
Satral J.
7-626-3
Lindell C.
Von Massow G.
7-657-5
Lamasine T.
Safranek V.[3]
6-42-67-66
Echargui M.
Vankan M.
6-36-3
Haider Maurer A.
Diarra G.
6-37-5
Dima D.
Collarini A.[4]
5-76-16-4
Netuschil M.
Coppejans K.
6-43-66-1
Masur D.
Haerteis J.
6-46-4
Moutet C.[1]
Margaroli L.
6-36-756-1