Martin Cuevas vs Joao Pedro Sorgi — Marburg CH Qualifying Round 1

Marburg CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
URU7
Martin Cuevas
34 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 2 July 2018
clay
BRA
Joao Pedro Sorgi
32 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWLLWW
Cuevas M.
6-4 6-3
Sorgi J.
Cuevas M.
662
Sorgi J.
430

Martin Cuevas defeated Joao Pedro Sorgi 6-4 6-3 in the Marburg CH qualifying round 1 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Joao Pedro Sorgi came in defending last year's quarter-final.

Key context

  • Match story: Martin Cuevas closed it out in two sets, 6–4 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Cuevas M.serving66% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Sorgi J.

Sorgi J.serving70% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Cuevas M.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Cuevas M.Sorgi J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
55%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
47%
Service points won·Even
61%
60%
Return points won·Even
38%
41%
Break points saved·Even
56%
55%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.5
3.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
4.0
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (141 vs 26). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Cuevas M.Sorgi J.
Clutch Rating·Even
14
18
Break points saved·Slight edge
35
42
Break points won·Slight edge
22
31
Deciding sets·Clear edge
20
34
Tiebreaks·Dominant
71
30

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Q3
Dima D.
Cuevas M.[7]
7-644-66-3
Lamasine T.
Gaio F.[5]
2-66-36-2
Benchetrit E.
Slobodchikov R.
6-37-5
Bellucci T.[6]
Moutet C.[1]
6-46-4
Q2
Dima D.
Haider Maurer A.
6-46-3
Bellucci T.[6]
Masur D.
6-46-2
Benchetrit E.
Blancaneaux G.[8]
6-26-2
Cuevas M.[7]
Echargui M.
5-76-27-65
Lamasine T.
Netuschil M.
6-23-66-0
Gaio F.[5]
Rodriguez C.
6-747-56-1
Slobodchikov R.
Oliveira G.[2]
6-16-3
Moutet C.[1]
Lindell C.
6-26-2
Q1
Oliveira G.[2]
Cias P.
6-16-3
Gaio F.[5]
Matos R.
6-36-4
Benchetrit E.
Cornea V.
6-46-2
Rodriguez C.
Mantilla F.
6-36-2
Bellucci T.[6]
Borza B.
6-26-0
Cuevas M.[7]
Sorgi J.
6-46-3
Slobodchikov R.
Satral J.
7-626-3
Lindell C.
Von Massow G.
7-657-5
Lamasine T.
Safranek V.[3]
6-42-67-66
Echargui M.
Vankan M.
6-36-3
Haider Maurer A.
Diarra G.
6-37-5
Dima D.
Collarini A.[4]
5-76-16-4
Netuschil M.
Coppejans K.
6-43-66-1
Masur D.
Haerteis J.
6-46-4
Moutet C.[1]
Margaroli L.
6-36-756-1