Thomaz Bellucci vs Corentin Moutet — Marburg CH Qualifying Final
Marburg CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Final
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 2 July 2018
clay
FRA1#40ATP
1745ELO
1692Clay ELO
$731kYTD
$6.4MCAREER
27 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLLL
Bellucci T.6-4 6-4
Moutet C.
Bellucci T.
662
Moutet C.
440
Thomaz Bellucci defeated Corentin Moutet 6-4 6-4 in the Marburg CH qualifying final on clay.
Key context
- Match story: Thomaz Bellucci edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.
Head to head
No previous meetings on record.
Serve vs return
This seasonBaseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks
Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About
Serve & return on clay
Bellucci T.Moutet C.
—
Serve
—
—
Return
64
Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Slight edge
58%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
51%
Service points won·Even
60%
61%
Return points won·Even
40%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
58%
63%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.4
2.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.2
2.3
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (151 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Dominant
21
82
Break points saved·Clear edge
79
97
Break points won·Dominant
21
75
Deciding sets·Dominant
20
88
Tiebreaks·Dominant
22
78
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About
Freshness
Recent loadFreshness·
—
96
Moutet C.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About
Conditions
Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Q3
Dima D.
Cuevas M.[7]
7-644-66-3
Lamasine T.
Gaio F.[5]
2-66-36-2
Benchetrit E.
Slobodchikov R.
6-37-5
Bellucci T.[6]
Moutet C.[1]
6-46-4
Q2
Dima D.
Haider Maurer A.
6-46-3
Bellucci T.[6]
Masur D.
6-46-2
Benchetrit E.
Blancaneaux G.[8]
6-26-2
Cuevas M.[7]
Echargui M.
5-76-27-65
Lamasine T.
Netuschil M.
6-23-66-0
Gaio F.[5]
Rodriguez C.
6-747-56-1
Slobodchikov R.
Oliveira G.[2]
6-16-3
Moutet C.[1]
Lindell C.
6-26-2
Q1
Oliveira G.[2]
Cias P.
6-16-3
Gaio F.[5]
Matos R.
6-36-4
Benchetrit E.
Cornea V.
6-46-2
Rodriguez C.
Mantilla F.
6-36-2
Bellucci T.[6]
Borza B.
6-26-0
Cuevas M.[7]
Sorgi J.
6-46-3
Slobodchikov R.
Satral J.
7-626-3
Lindell C.
Von Massow G.
7-657-5
Lamasine T.
Safranek V.[3]
6-42-67-66
Echargui M.
Vankan M.
6-36-3
Haider Maurer A.
Diarra G.
6-37-5
Dima D.
Collarini A.[4]
5-76-16-4
Netuschil M.
Coppejans K.
6-43-66-1
Masur D.
Haerteis J.
6-46-4
Moutet C.[1]
Margaroli L.
6-36-756-1