Tatsuma Ito vs Cameron Norrie — Nottingham CH Round of 32

Nottingham CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
JPN
Tatsuma Ito
38 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 11 June 2018
grass
Cameron Norrie
GBR1
Cameron Norrie
#38ATP
1829ELO
1719Grass ELO
$963kYTD
$15MCAREER
30 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWWLW
Ito T.
1-6 7-5 6-3
Norrie C.
Ito T.
1762
Norrie C.
6531

Tatsuma Ito defeated Cameron Norrie 1-6 7-5 6-3 in the Nottingham CH round of 32 on grass. The upset overturned the form book — Cameron Norrie came in defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ito T.serving84% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Norrie C.

Norrie C.serving87% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Ito T.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ito T.Norrie C.
1st serve in·Even
62%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
52%
Service points won·Even
61%
64%
Return points won·Even
38%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
60%
65%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.8
5.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.1
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (188 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ito T.Norrie C.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
24
90
Break points saved·Dominant
61
99
Break points won·Dominant
9
83
Deciding sets·Dominant
43
98
Tiebreaks·Dominant
48
89

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Ito T.Norrie C.
Freshness·
—
100

Norrie C.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
De Minaur A.[2]
Evans D.
7-647-5
Semi-finals
Evans D.
Granollers M.
4-66-26-3
De Minaur A.[2]
Ivashka I.[4]
6-26-4
Quarter-finals
Evans D.
Schnur B.
7-656-3
De Minaur A.[2]
Polansky P.[6]
6-33-66-2
Granollers M.
Ramanathan R.[5]
7-654-67-64
Ivashka I.[4]
Ward J.
6-46-3
R16
Ward J.
Polmans M.
3-67-656-4
Schnur B.
Ito T.
6-33-67-65
Ivashka I.[4]
Menendez Maceiras A.
4-66-36-4
Ramanathan R.[5]
Kamke T.
7-616-3
Granollers M.
Ward A.
6-46-3
De Minaur A.[2]
Eubanks C.
6-46-4
Evans D.
Stakhovsky S.[7]
7-57-62
Polansky P.[6]
Robert S.
6-36-4
R32
Menendez Maceiras A.
Nielsen F.
6-47-68
Eubanks C.
Kozlov S.
6-36-3
Polansky P.[6]
Loffhagen G.
3-66-16-3
Ivashka I.[4]
Kubler J.
1-67-646-4
Ward A.
Broady L.
2-66-47-67
Ito T.
Norrie C.[1]
1-67-56-3
Evans D.
Koepfer D.
6-37-5
Stakhovsky S.[7]
Moraing M.
6-37-5
Ramanathan R.[5]
Jung J.
6-747-56-4
Robert S.
Bublik A.
7-676-3
Kamke T.
Clarke J.
6-36-3
Granollers M.
Fabbiano T.[3]
7-57-63
Schnur B.
Peliwo F.
6-36-2
Polmans M.
Mmoh M.[8]
6-46-4
Ward J.
Simon T.
6-46-757-61
De Minaur A.[2]
Melzer J.
6-46-1