Felix Auger Aliassime vs Miomir Kecmanovic — Lyon CH Semi-final

Lyon CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
Felix Auger Aliassime
CAN
Felix Auger Aliassime
#4ATP
1958ELO
1864Clay ELO
$2.1MYTD
$23MCAREER
25 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 11 June 2018
clay
Miomir Kecmanovic
SRB
Miomir Kecmanovic
#59ATP
1768ELO
1733Clay ELO
$756kYTD
$9.0MCAREER
26 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLWWLLWWW
Auger Aliassime F.
6-2 7-6
Kecmanovic M.
Auger Aliassime F.
6782
Kecmanovic M.
2660

Felix Auger Aliassime defeated Miomir Kecmanovic 6-2 7-6 in the Lyon CH semi-final on clay. The result followed the form book — Felix Auger Aliassime came in ranked #4, defending the title. Felix Auger Aliassime extended the head-to-head to 3–2.

Key context

Head to head

2–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2022-10-24BaselR16hardFelix Auger Aliassime6-1 6-0
2022-09-17Davis Cup Finals RR: SRB vs CANRRhardFelix Auger Aliassime6-3 6-4
2022-03-21Miami MastersR64hardMiomir Kecmanovic6-4 6-2
2019-08-12Cincinnati MastersR64hardMiomir Kecmanovic6-3 6-3
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Auger Aliassime F.serving87% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Kecmanovic M.

Kecmanovic M.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Auger Aliassime F.

Serve advantage — Auger Aliassime F.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Auger Aliassime F.Kecmanovic M.
1st serve in·Even
64%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
77%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
52%
Service points won·Even
68%
64%
Return points won·Even
36%
37%
Break points saved·Even
64%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
9.4
4.6
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.6
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Auger Aliassime F.Kecmanovic M.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
84
68
Break points saved·Even
100
98
Break points won·Clear edge
50
67
Deciding sets·Dominant
99
60
Tiebreaks·Dominant
99
69

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Auger Aliassime F.Kecmanovic M.
Freshness·Clear edge
70
82

Auger Aliassime F.: 7 days rest · 1 match, 57 games (7d) · Kecmanovic M.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 23 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Auger Aliassime F.
Tatlot J.
6-737-56-2
Semi-finals
Auger Aliassime F.
Kecmanovic M.
6-27-66
Tatlot J.
Marcora R.
7-616-2
Quarter-finals
Marcora R.
Garin C.
6-13-66-4
Auger Aliassime F.
Muller A.
6-36-1
Tatlot J.
Pavlasek A.
1-67-636-3
Kecmanovic M.
Popyrin A.
7-52-66-4
R16
Marcora R.
Bonzi B.
6-07-64
Tatlot J.
Galan D.
3-66-26-4
Auger Aliassime F.
Hoang A.
6-37-5
Muller A.
Domingues J.
2-67-56-4
Kecmanovic M.
Ymer M.
6-27-67
Garin C.
Krueger M.
3-66-37-5
Popyrin A.
Bourgue M.
6-46-4
Pavlasek A.
Andujar P.[4]
7-650-66-5
R32
Hoang A.
Hernandez J.
6-26-2
Popyrin A.
Safranek V.
6-36-3
Kecmanovic M.
Vilella Martinez M.
6-46-3
Marcora R.
Halys Q.[5]
5-76-46-2
Krueger M.
Martinez P.
6-41-66-0
Bonzi B.
Lamasine T.
6-36-4
Auger Aliassime F.
Moutet C.[8]
6-26-2
Bourgue M.
Laaksonen H.[6]
7-661-67-5
Ymer M.
Carballes Baena R.[1]
6-37-5
Andujar P.[4]
Quiroz R.
6-27-5
Tatlot J.
Benchetrit E.
7-56-4
Garin C.
Melzer G.[2]
6-36-3
Galan D.
Vatutin A.[7]
6-16-3
Domingues J.
De Schepper K.
5-76-26-3
Muller A.
Sousa P.[3]
7-56-3
Pavlasek A.
Sakharov G.
6-16-1