Zsombor Piros vs Christian Lindell — Poznan CH Qualifying Round 2

Poznan CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 2
Zsombor Piros
HUN
Zsombor Piros
#120ATP
1661ELO
1621Clay ELO
$145kYTD
$975kCAREER
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWWWWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 4 June 2018
clay
SWE
Christian Lindell
34 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWL
Piros Z.
6-4 5-7 6-3
Lindell C.
Piros Z.
6562
Lindell C.
4731

Zsombor Piros defeated Christian Lindell 6-4 5-7 6-3 in the Poznan CH qualifying round 2 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Zsombor Piros closed it out in three sets, 6–4 5–7 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Piros Z.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Lindell C.

Lindell C.serving61% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Piros Z.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Piros Z.Lindell C.
1st serve in·Even
59%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
66%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
53%
46%
Service points won·Even
61%
58%
Return points won·Even
40%
39%
Break points saved·Even
61%
58%
Aces / match·Even
3.1
3.4
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.7
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 34). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Piros Z.Lindell C.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
57
17
Break points saved·Dominant
84
54
Break points won·Clear edge
32
20
Deciding sets·Dominant
85
34
Tiebreaks·Dominant
48
21

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Piros Z.Lindell C.
Freshness·
54
—

Piros Z.: 2 days rest · 5 matches, 107 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Q3
Jahn J.
Olaso G.[8]
6-756-16-2
Arnaboldi A.[2]
Piros Z.
7-637-63
Bourgue M.[5]
Hernandez J.[4]
6-16-4
Escoffier A.
Geens C.
6-32-1
Q2
Hernandez J.[4]
Marcora R.
7-666-4
Geens C.
Rosol L.[3]
6-46-2
Bourgue M.[5]
Song E.
6-16-3
Escoffier A.
Dancevic F.[7]
4-66-46-2
Piros Z.
Lindell C.
6-45-76-3
Arnaboldi A.[2]
Rajski M.
6-16-4
Olaso G.[8]
Slobodchikov R.
6-43-66-1
Jahn J.
Zapata Miralles B.[1]
6-43-66-0
Q1
Olaso G.[8]
Ficovich J.
6-46-2
Rosol L.[3]
Tadyszak N.
6-36-2
Escoffier A.
Panfil G.
6-36-2
Arnaboldi A.[2]
Vukic A.
7-656-4
Hernandez J.[4]
Popyrin A.
6-46-2
Lindell C.
Coria F.[6]
6-30-0
Marcora R.
Wojcik J.
6-756-26-2
Piros Z.
Ambrozy F.
6-16-0
Bourgue M.[5]
Vavassori A.
6-16-4
Song E.
Kalenichenko D.
6-16-2
Dancevic F.[7]
Furness E.
6-16-3
Geens C.
Sorgi J.
0-66-46-2
Rajski M.
Hampel L.
7-6106-4
Slobodchikov R.
Bonadio R.
6-36-4
Jahn J.
Zuk K.
6-36-4
Zapata Miralles B.[1]
Blanch U.
6-36-4