Denis Kudla vs Lukas Lacko — Surbiton CH Round of 16

Surbiton CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
USA
Denis Kudla
33 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 4 June 2018
grass
SVK5
Lukas Lacko
38 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLWL
Kudla D.
6-4 6-0
Lacko L.
Kudla D.
662
Lacko L.
400

Denis Kudla defeated Lukas Lacko 6-4 6-0 in the Surbiton CH round of 16 on grass. The result followed the form book — Denis Kudla came in leading the head-to-head 3–2. Denis Kudla extended the head-to-head to 4–2.

Key context

Head to head

3–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2018-07-30WashingtonR64hardDenis Kudla6-7(3) 6-1 6-4
2018-06-18HalleR32grassDenis Kudla6-4 6-4
2017-01-16Australian OpenQ3hardLukas Lacko6-2 6-2
2015-03-25Miami MastersQ1hardLukas Lacko6-7(2) 6-4 7-5
2015-02-16Delray BeachR32hardDenis Kudla6-3 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Kudla D.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Lacko L.

Lacko L.serving87% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Kudla D.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kudla D.Lacko L.
1st serve in·Even
59%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
49%
Service points won·Even
63%
63%
Return points won·Even
37%
35%
Break points saved·Even
59%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.6
7.2
Double faults / match·Even
2.7
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 181). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kudla D.Lacko L.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
50
26
Break points saved·Even
90
86
Break points won·Slight edge
19
8
Deciding sets·Dominant
81
33
Tiebreaks·Even
30
27

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Chardy J.[1]
De Minaur A.[6]
6-44-66-2
Semi-finals
De Minaur A.[6]
Ebden M.
6-46-4
Chardy J.[1]
Evans D.
6-47-63
Quarter-finals
Chardy J.[1]
Kudla D.
7-654-67-68
Evans D.
Melzer J.
7-636-4
De Minaur A.[6]
Bhambri Y.[3]
6-37-5
Ebden M.
Stakhovsky S.
6-46-4
R16
Stakhovsky S.
Ramanathan R.
6-47-64
Ebden M.
Mcdonald M.[7]
6-36-756-3
Evans D.
Moraing M.
7-646-3
Melzer J.
King K.
6-46-4
Kudla D.
Lacko L.[5]
6-46-0
Bhambri Y.[3]
Bolt A.
6-43-66-1
De Minaur A.[6]
Fritz T.
6-47-64
Chardy J.[1]
Brands D.
7-636-3
R32
Brands D.
Menendez Maceiras A.
6-34-67-5
Ebden M.
Brown D.
6-757-56-3
Mcdonald M.[7]
Polansky P.
6-747-56-3
Fritz T.
Glasspool L.
4-66-36-4
Moraing M.
Fratangelo B.[8]
3-66-37-64
Melzer J.
Polmans M.
6-43-67-62
King K.
Youzhny M.[4]
7-647-5
Kudla D.
Bublik A.
3-67-656-1
Chardy J.[1]
Broady L.
7-6106-3
Evans D.
Fabbiano T.
6-47-5
Ramanathan R.
Thompson J.[2]
6-43-66-1
Bolt A.
Clarke J.
6-16-736-3
De Minaur A.[6]
Ward A.
6-46-1
Bhambri Y.[3]
Kokkinakis T.
6-47-64
Lacko L.[5]
Novikov D.
4-66-17-5
Stakhovsky S.
Ward J.
4-66-36-3