Alex De Minaur vs Matthew Ebden — Surbiton CH Semi-final

Surbiton CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
Alex De Minaur
AUS6
Alex De Minaur
#5ATP
1961ELO
1834Grass ELO
$2.4MYTD
$25MCAREER
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLWWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 4 June 2018
grass
AUS
Matthew Ebden
38 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWW
De Minaur A.
6-4 6-4
Ebden M.
De Minaur A.
662
Ebden M.
440

Alex De Minaur defeated Matthew Ebden 6-4 6-4 in the Surbiton CH semi-final on grass. The upset overturned the form book — Matthew Ebden came in defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

  • Match story: Alex De Minaur edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
De Minaur A.serving91% hold

wins 71% of points on serve vs Ebden M.

Ebden M.serving81% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs De Minaur A.

Serve advantage — De Minaur A.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
De Minaur A.Ebden M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
56%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
73%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
55%
48%
Service points won·Even
65%
63%
Return points won·Slight edge
41%
36%
Break points saved·Even
61%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.2
6.6
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.5
4.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 139). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
De Minaur A.Ebden M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
95
45
Break points saved·Clear edge
99
86
Break points won·Dominant
97
32
Deciding sets·Dominant
97
58
Tiebreaks·Dominant
99
34

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
De Minaur A.Ebden M.
Freshness·
83
—

De Minaur A.: 8 days rest · 4 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Chardy J.[1]
De Minaur A.[6]
6-44-66-2
Semi-finals
De Minaur A.[6]
Ebden M.
6-46-4
Chardy J.[1]
Evans D.
6-47-63
Quarter-finals
Chardy J.[1]
Kudla D.
7-654-67-68
Evans D.
Melzer J.
7-636-4
De Minaur A.[6]
Bhambri Y.[3]
6-37-5
Ebden M.
Stakhovsky S.
6-46-4
R16
Stakhovsky S.
Ramanathan R.
6-47-64
Ebden M.
Mcdonald M.[7]
6-36-756-3
Evans D.
Moraing M.
7-646-3
Melzer J.
King K.
6-46-4
Kudla D.
Lacko L.[5]
6-46-0
Bhambri Y.[3]
Bolt A.
6-43-66-1
De Minaur A.[6]
Fritz T.
6-47-64
Chardy J.[1]
Brands D.
7-636-3
R32
Brands D.
Menendez Maceiras A.
6-34-67-5
Ebden M.
Brown D.
6-757-56-3
Mcdonald M.[7]
Polansky P.
6-747-56-3
Fritz T.
Glasspool L.
4-66-36-4
Moraing M.
Fratangelo B.[8]
3-66-37-64
Melzer J.
Polmans M.
6-43-67-62
King K.
Youzhny M.[4]
7-647-5
Kudla D.
Bublik A.
3-67-656-1
Chardy J.[1]
Broady L.
7-6106-3
Evans D.
Fabbiano T.
6-47-5
Ramanathan R.
Thompson J.[2]
6-43-66-1
Bolt A.
Clarke J.
6-16-736-3
De Minaur A.[6]
Ward A.
6-46-1
Bhambri Y.[3]
Kokkinakis T.
6-47-64
Lacko L.[5]
Novikov D.
4-66-17-5
Stakhovsky S.
Ward J.
4-66-36-3