Daniel Brands vs Adrian Menendez Maceiras — Surbiton CH Round of 32

Surbiton CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
GER
Daniel Brands
38 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWLLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 4 June 2018
grass
ESP
Adrian Menendez Maceiras
40 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWWWLW
Brands D.
6-3 4-6 7-5
Menendez Maceiras A.
Brands D.
6472
Menendez Maceiras A.
3651

Daniel Brands defeated Adrian Menendez Maceiras 6-3 4-6 7-5 in the Surbiton CH round of 32 on grass. Daniel Brands extended the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Daniel Brands closed it out in three sets, 6–3 4–6 7–5.

Head to head

1–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2017-07-24GstaadQ1clayDaniel Brands6-2 6-3
2017-01-16Australian OpenQ1hardAdrian Menendez Maceiras3-6 7-6(7) 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Brands D.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Menendez Maceiras A.

Menendez Maceiras A.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Brands D.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Brands D.Menendez Maceiras A.
1st serve in·Slight edge
67%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
74%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
50%
Service points won·Even
66%
62%
Return points won·Even
34%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
66%
58%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.3
3.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.9
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (68 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Brands D.Menendez Maceiras A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
46
21
Break points saved·Dominant
90
54
Break points won·Even
7
6
Deciding sets·Dominant
71
32
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
49
71

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Chardy J.[1]
De Minaur A.[6]
6-44-66-2
Semi-finals
De Minaur A.[6]
Ebden M.
6-46-4
Chardy J.[1]
Evans D.
6-47-63
Quarter-finals
Chardy J.[1]
Kudla D.
7-654-67-68
Evans D.
Melzer J.
7-636-4
De Minaur A.[6]
Bhambri Y.[3]
6-37-5
Ebden M.
Stakhovsky S.
6-46-4
R16
Stakhovsky S.
Ramanathan R.
6-47-64
Ebden M.
Mcdonald M.[7]
6-36-756-3
Evans D.
Moraing M.
7-646-3
Melzer J.
King K.
6-46-4
Kudla D.
Lacko L.[5]
6-46-0
Bhambri Y.[3]
Bolt A.
6-43-66-1
De Minaur A.[6]
Fritz T.
6-47-64
Chardy J.[1]
Brands D.
7-636-3
R32
Brands D.
Menendez Maceiras A.
6-34-67-5
Ebden M.
Brown D.
6-757-56-3
Mcdonald M.[7]
Polansky P.
6-747-56-3
Fritz T.
Glasspool L.
4-66-36-4
Moraing M.
Fratangelo B.[8]
3-66-37-64
Melzer J.
Polmans M.
6-43-67-62
King K.
Youzhny M.[4]
7-647-5
Kudla D.
Bublik A.
3-67-656-1
Chardy J.[1]
Broady L.
7-6106-3
Evans D.
Fabbiano T.
6-47-5
Ramanathan R.
Thompson J.[2]
6-43-66-1
Bolt A.
Clarke J.
6-16-736-3
De Minaur A.[6]
Ward A.
6-46-1
Bhambri Y.[3]
Kokkinakis T.
6-47-64
Lacko L.[5]
Novikov D.
4-66-17-5
Stakhovsky S.
Ward J.
4-66-36-3