Taro Daniel vs Facundo Bagnis — Poznan CH Quarter-final

Poznan CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Taro Daniel
JPN1
Taro Daniel
#194ATP
1567ELO
1542Clay ELO
33 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 4 June 2018
clay
ARG
Facundo Bagnis
#431ATP
1591ELO
1584Clay ELO
36 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWWL
Daniel T.
6-4 7-5
Bagnis F.
Daniel T.
672
Bagnis F.
450

Taro Daniel defeated Facundo Bagnis 6-4 7-5 in the Poznan CH quarter-final on clay. The result followed the form book — Taro Daniel came in ranked #194, leading the head-to-head 2–1. Taro Daniel extended the head-to-head to 3–1.

Key context

Head to head

2–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2021-08-30US OpenR128hardFacundo Bagnis6-3 6-3 6-3
2016-04-11Monte Carlo MastersQ2clayTaro Daniel7-6(5) 6-4
2015-03-25Miami MastersQ1hardTaro Daniel0-6 6-3 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Daniel T.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Bagnis F.

Bagnis F.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Daniel T.

Serve advantage — Bagnis F.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Daniel T.Bagnis F.
1st serve in·Even
60%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
51%
Service points won·Even
62%
63%
Return points won·Even
37%
40%
Break points saved·Even
62%
62%
Aces / match·Even
4.0
4.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.1
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 198). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Daniel T.Bagnis F.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
42
54
Break points saved·Even
93
92
Break points won·Even
37
35
Deciding sets·Dominant
18
89
Tiebreaks·Dominant
81
3

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Daniel T.Bagnis F.
Freshness·
59
—

Daniel T.: 1 day rest · 4 matches, 83 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Hurkacz H.
Daniel T.[1]
6-16-1
Semi-finals
Daniel T.[1]
Halys Q.[6]
7-666-3
Hurkacz H.
Giannessi A.
6-43-66-3
Quarter-finals
Giannessi A.
Balazs A.
6-47-5
Halys Q.[6]
Arnaboldi A.
6-17-63
Hurkacz H.
Vatutin A.[8]
6-36-2
Daniel T.[1]
Bagnis F.
6-47-5
R16
Hurkacz H.
Donati M.
6-36-756-3
Vatutin A.[8]
Jahn J.
7-644-66-3
Giannessi A.
Estrella V.
4-66-36-3
Arnaboldi A.
Klizan M.[3]
6-36-3
Bagnis F.
Granollers M.[5]
6-17-64
Daniel T.[1]
Bourgue M.
6-46-2
Balazs A.
Laaksonen H.[7]
6-06-1
Halys Q.[6]
Escoffier A.
7-635-76-4
R32
Hurkacz H.
Andreozzi G.[2]
6-17-5
Donati M.
Dembek M.
7-646-3
Jahn J.
Majchrzak K.
6-32-66-0
Vatutin A.[8]
De Schepper K.
6-26-4
Giannessi A.
Sousa P.[4]
6-26-3
Estrella V.
Cias P.
6-31-66-4
Halys Q.[6]
Cornea V.
6-16-4
Escoffier A.
Santillan A.
6-46-3
Klizan M.[3]
Krueger M.
6-26-2
Bagnis F.
Kovalik J.
6-37-5
Daniel T.[1]
Kecmanovic M.
7-56-3
Granollers M.[5]
Quiroz R.
6-25-76-3
Arnaboldi A.
Otte O.
6-23-66-3
Balazs A.
Novak D.
6-36-2
Laaksonen H.[7]
Kubler J.
6-46-2
Bourgue M.
Brkic T.
6-16-4