Tim Puetz vs Norbert Gombos — Heilbronn CH Round of 32

Heilbronn CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
GER
Tim Puetz
38 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 14 May 2018
clay
Norbert Gombos
SVK8
Norbert Gombos
#370ATP
1472ELO
1455Clay ELO
35 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWWLWL
Puetz T.
6-4 4-6 6-3
Gombos N.
Puetz T.
6462
Gombos N.
4631

Tim Puetz defeated Norbert Gombos 6-4 4-6 6-3 in the Heilbronn CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Norbert Gombos came in defending last year's final.

Key context

  • Match story: Tim Puetz closed it out in three sets, 6–4 4–6 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Puetz T.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Gombos N.

Gombos N.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Puetz T.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Puetz T.Gombos N.
1st serve in·Even
59%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
51%
Service points won·Even
64%
63%
Return points won·Even
36%
38%
Break points saved·Even
60%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.2
4.9
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.7
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (29 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Puetz T.Gombos N.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
27
41
Break points saved·Even
80
83
Break points won·Slight edge
19
8
Deciding sets·Dominant
36
70
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
21
36

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Puetz T.Gombos N.
Freshness·
—
79

Gombos N.: 3 days rest · 2 matches, 39 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Molleker R.
Vesely J.[2]
4-66-47-5
Semi-finals
Vesely J.[2]
Majchrzak K.
7-56-2
Molleker R.
Londero J.
4-66-36-2
Quarter-finals
Majchrzak K.
Brown D.
6-33-1
Vesely J.[2]
Laaksonen H.[6]
6-36-1
Londero J.
Otte O.
6-43-66-3
Molleker R.
Vatutin A.[7]
6-12-66-4
R16
Brown D.
Moraing M.
W/O
Majchrzak K.
Maden Y.[3]
6-46-3
Vesely J.[2]
Sijsling I.
6-34-66-2
Laaksonen H.[6]
Hassan B.
6-756-27-5
Vatutin A.[7]
Zapata Miralles B.
4-66-46-2
Molleker R.
Hanfmann Y.[4]
4-66-36-3
Otte O.
Puetz T.
7-56-767-66
Londero J.
Koepfer D.
7-625-76-3
R32
Sijsling I.
King D.
6-44-1
Maden Y.[3]
Novikov D.
6-43-0
Majchrzak K.
Safwat M.
6-36-4
Moraing M.
Zopp J.[5]
6-47-65
Zapata Miralles B.
Kamke T.
6-06-4
Koepfer D.
Masur D.
7-56-4
Vesely J.[2]
Moeller M.
6-26-2
Hassan B.
Bachinger M.
6-26-736-3
Vatutin A.[7]
Krstin P.
6-26-2
Puetz T.
Gombos N.[8]
6-44-66-3
Otte O.
Rola B.
4-66-37-66
Londero J.
Millman J.[1]
1-66-16-2
Hanfmann Y.[4]
Polmans M.
6-24-66-3
Laaksonen H.[6]
Giannessi A.
4-66-46-4
Molleker R.
Lopez Perez E.
6-46-3
Brown D.
Ruud C.
7-644-66-3