Blake Ellis vs Tung Lin Wu — Busan CH Qualifying Round 1

Busan CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
AUS
Blake Ellis
#472ATP
1416ELO
1390Hard ELO
27 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLLLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 14 May 2018
hard
Tung Lin Wu
TPE
Tung Lin Wu
#329ATP
1406ELO
1376Hard ELO
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLLW
Ellis B.
7-5 6-4
Wu T.
Ellis B.
762
Wu T.
540

Blake Ellis defeated Tung Lin Wu 7-5 6-4 in the Busan CH qualifying round 1 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Tung Lin Wu came in ranked #329, defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ellis B.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Wu T.

Wu T.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Ellis B.

Serve advantage — Wu T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ellis B.Wu T.
1st serve in·Slight edge
58%
68%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
51%
Service points won·Even
62%
63%
Return points won·Even
36%
39%
Break points saved·Even
61%
62%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.7
3.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.0
1.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (144 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ellis B.Wu T.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
41
10
Break points saved·Slight edge
79
84
Break points won·Even
3
6
Deciding sets·Dominant
78
6
Tiebreaks·Dominant
37
4

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Ellis B.Wu T.
Freshness·Clear edge
92
80

Ellis B.: 9 days rest · 3 matches (14d) · Wu T.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 16 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Q3
Statham J.[4]
Olaso G.[7]
6-46-2
Banes M.[5]
Ellis B.
7-636-1
Chung Y.
Saville L.
6-767-626-0
Watanuki Y.[3]
Nielsen F.
1-66-46-0
Q2
Nielsen F.
Trongcharoenchaikul W.[8]
6-756-46-0
Statham J.[4]
Lee T.
7-636-3
Banes M.[5]
Bury A.
6-33-67-63
Olaso G.[7]
Fancutt T.
6-17-5
Watanuki Y.[3]
Lee J.
6-46-4
Ellis B.
Ehara H.[2]
7-633-66-3
Saville L.
Tokuda R.[6]
6-22-66-1
Chung Y.
Kubler J.[1]
6-36-2
Q1
Ellis B.
Wu T.
7-56-4
Bury A.
Hsieh C.
4-1
Lee J.
Oh S.
7-646-3
Tokuda R.[6]
Grills J.
6-747-56-3
Olaso G.[7]
Kim J.
6-07-5
Fancutt T.
Rungkat C.
6-36-4
Lee T.
Kim D.
6-46-4
Trongcharoenchaikul W.[8]
Lim Y.
6-757-636-2
Nielsen F.
Ochi M.
6-10-0
Banes M.[5]
Chung H.
6-36-4
Saville L.
Yoo D.
6-16-0
Chung Y.
Patael B.
6-36-2